Search for: "In Re Rogers"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 3,106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2014, 10:01 pm
Hal Rogers (R-KY), initially rejected the amendment based on a voice vote, but a roll-call vote resulted in 28-22 in favor. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 2:15 pm
We're really at the cusp of the enterprise changing, and authors Don Tapscott and Anthony D. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 12:07 am
We're the government, and we're here to copy - Blueport Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm
He doesn’t think they’re doing anything wrong,” presumably referring to Trump. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 8:24 am
We're really at the cusp of the enterprise changing, and authors Don Tapscott and Anthony D. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 11:22 am
Roger Sherman Transfer Co., 3 A.D.2d 882. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 1:50 pm
” “We’re talking to our colleagues on the bar and on the bench, people we know because we’re familiar with those communities,” said Joseph, a co-chair of the government-contracts practice at Rogers Joseph O’Donnell in San Francisco. [read post]
26 May 2010, 5:42 am
You’re right. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:55 am
Roger Pielke in Forbes bemoans the futility of it all. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 9:39 am
Roger Smith sums up the concept as follows: Legal design is a distinctive approach with the following attributes: 1. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 9:40 am
Sessoms & Rogers, P.A., 676 F.3d 365 (4th Cir. 2012), the Court rejected Res-Care’s argument. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 6:53 am
Rogers and Coleman oppose taking that money away. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 12:19 am
Rogers' story, as a factual matter, seemed relatively credible, both because of his history of accurate outings and because there is no discernible reason why, if he were intent on fabricating, he would single out someone as obscure as Larry Craig, who was not even up for re-election....Among right-wing pundits -- weeks before the election -- there was nothing but support for Craig and outrage over the reporting of this story. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:10 pm
Supp. at 276 (citing Rogers v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 7:22 am
"Rogers' analysis shows why I'm less apt to reject all uses of risk assessments. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:00 pm
With the snowball effect, many of those re-employed people would be enabled to modify or otherwise keep their homes. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 7:29 pm
I'm not always a fan of leaving the limiting constructions for cases in which they're needed, because courts sometimes forget that they're needed, but here I'm willing to trust judicial good sense. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 7:20 am
Get used to me, you’re going to be seeing a lot of me. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 2:30 pm
We’re past absurd. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:53 am
But for now, it’s over to you Roger. [read post]
