Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 1421 - 1440 of 39,628
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2012, 10:44 am by Gene Quinn
Also, Justices are no doubt aware of other pending cases which may find their way to the Supreme Court, such as AMP v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:18 am by Steven G. Pearl
People seem to forget that the Court has no deadline for hearing cases on its docket, as demonstrated by the fact that it took more than five years to decide Martinez v. [read post]
As painful as it may be for many of us who sense that justice was not served in Ashers, we should probably indulge its artifice. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:16 am by Emma Snell
The move may be motivated by the Kremlin’s desire to exert more control over the occupation and forcefully conscript people in occupied areas to fight on Russia’s behalf, according to an assessment by the Institute for the Study of War. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 12:16 am
In other words, it is not enough that people may buy more of the second brand - they have to buy less of the first. [read post]
7 May 2025, 2:33 pm by Kent Berk
Introduction In April 2025, the Arizona Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in Estate of Magdalena Rios De Dominguez v. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 1:22 pm by Patrick A. Malone
In the crunch to quell the coronavirus pandemic and to do so by getting as many people as possible their protective shots, public health officials consistently have stressed a big V in the national vaccination campaign: Voluntary. [read post]
30 May 2007, 3:59 pm
May 15, 2007) Ed. note: Funny thing about the blogosphere -- news gets old fast. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
People who are promiscuous may be more likely to sleep with someone on any given day, but they are no more likely than a less sexually experienced person to invent a false accusation against an innocent man. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 4:43 pm
On July 14, 2009, the Court of Appeals published  its Per Curiam  Opinion in the consolidated matters of State of Michigan v. [read post]