Search for: "Public Citizen v. Department of Justice"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 1,818
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm
Margaret McKeown, Citizen Justice: The Environmental Legacy of William O. [read post]
20 Mar 2025, 6:30 am
Crockett v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
It applied a test drawn from the concurring opinion of Justice David Souter in the 2009 case of Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 6:49 am
The Supreme Court in Hamdi v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
The problem is that the Justice Department declined to bring such charges. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:13 am
From an opinion in Valentin v. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 10:00 am
In Wisconsin v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:51 pm
SCOTUS has not decided this question, preferring to resolve the issue on statutory grounds in Department of Commerce v House of Representatives, 525 U.S. 316 (1999). [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:37 am
Such a challenge could force prosecutors to draw from another source within the Department of Justice, or face dismissal. [read post]
5 Nov 2024, 2:43 pm
Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that it intended to send poll watchers to locations in the City of St. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am
In 2020, the proposal was vetted by the federal interagency Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), which is comprised of representatives from 16 U.S. departments and agencies, including Treasury, Justice, Commerce, Defense, Energy, and Homeland Security. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:02 pm
The federal Bill of Rights is understood to set a minimum standard, which permits states, by statute or constitutional provision, to grant more protection to their citizens—and many do.In antidiscrimination law, the same is true, but even more so. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:48 pm
Laird and Marbury v. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 6:57 am
Indeed, Roberts relied heavily on Justice Robert Jackson’s concurring opinion in Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
Miller (Wikipedia) U.S. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:39 am
In Toyukak v. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
(1-B) The presence of the applicant seeking anticipatory bail shall be obligatory at the time of final hearing of the application and passing of final order by the Court, if on an application made to it by the Public Prosecutor, the Court considers such presence necessary in the interest of justice. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
At the end of a dizzying first month of Trump’s presidency, the Department of Justice and Department of Education issued a “Dear Colleague” letter withdrawing two statements of policy about the rights of transgender students. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am
”[x] Under the GLBA, financial institutions, in actions brought by the Department of Justice only (there is no private right of action under GLBA), can be fined up to $100,000 for each violation, and directors and officers of financial institutions could be held personally liable for civil penalties of up to $10,000 for each violation. [read post]
