Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF D B"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 10,343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2007, 11:20 am
(d) For the purposes of this section, "governing documents" shall include, but are not limited to, the conditions, covenants, and restrictions of the common interest development, and the bylaws, rules and regulations of the association. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 4:09 pm
Click here to review the draft regulations.Some definitions to start chewing over...30.2(a) Compensation means anything of value, including money, credits, loans, interest on premium, forgiveness of principal or interest, vacations, prizes, or gifts, whether paid as commission or otherwise. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 4:43 am
McManus, in which the Justices are considering whether a district judge can dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) without referring the case for consideration by a three-judge panel. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 6:37 am
All interest payment so be repaid. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:48 pm
’ § 784 .046(1)(b). [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:19 pm
Private funds almost always rely on one of two exemptions, Rule 506(b) or Rule 506(c), both of which are part of Regulation D, promulgated under the Securities Act. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 11:17 am
Reference to title 35, United States Code.Sec. 3. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 10:31 am
The Appellate Division, Third Department, held that jurisdiction cannot be invoked under Domestic Relations Law § 75-d (1) (b) if another State is the “home State”of the child. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:09 pm
The Appellate Division, Third Department, held that jurisdiction cannot be invoked under Domestic Relations Law § 75-d (1) (b) if another State is the “home State”of the child. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:15 am
§1322(b)(2) states that the plan may: "modify the rights of holders of secured claims, other than a claim secured only by a security interest in real property that is the debtor’s principal residence, or of holders of unsecured claims, or leave unaffected the rights of holders of any class of claims. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 10:07 am
Specifically, an oral agreement concerning the sale of real estate will be enforceable where it is established by clear and convincing evidence that the following has been articulated (a) a sufficient description of the real estate; (b) the nature of the interest that is to be transferred; (c) the identity of the transferor and transferee of the interest; and (d) the existence of an agreement. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 2:11 pm
Specifically, an oral agreement concerning the sale of real estate will be enforceable where it is established by clear and convincing evidence that the following has been articulated (a) a sufficient description of the real estate; (b) the nature of the interest that is to be transferred; (c) the identity of the transferor and transferee of the interest; and (d) the existence of an agreement. [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am
B. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
The contribution argues that the resulting context provides a basis for either for extending sovereign immunity to those regulatory responsibilities of all economic actors (irrespective of their public or private ownership) or of the reconception of sovereign regulation through legal compliance obligations as inherently commercial and thus not protected b principles of sovereign immunity when undertaken by SOEs. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 8:14 pm
” (Vermont Stat Ann, Title 15, § 1204 [b].) [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 11:18 am
”) United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 11:08 am
I’d like to add that Mr. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 2:42 pm
Hochfelder case in 1976 had inferred the scienter requirement for Rule 10b-5 actions not based on the language of Rule 10b-5 but based on the meaning and requirements of Section 10(b), on which Rule 10b-5 is based. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:20 am
Déjà vu This is the second time the TTAB has canceled the “Redskins” marks. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:48 am
A or B or C ~A B or C ~B ∴C The syllogism works as a valid form of argument if the premises are all true. [read post]