Search for: "United States v. Classic" Results 1421 - 1440 of 1,755
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm by Paula Mitchell
Despite the vote in California, the use of the death penalty is on the decline in the United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 12:42 pm
” Marx said several times that once that often only when a thing develops to its classic or final state (including their extreme state) does it become possible to understand the stages of development and essential nature of a thing. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 5:10 am by Cyberleagle
They are merely the means by which the state seeks to control – regulate, if you like - the speech of end-users. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm by Daphne Keller
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 7:27 am by Sasha Volokh
The Article I Nondelegation Doctrine The main giver-based nondelegation doctrine is the classic Nondelegation Doctrine stemming from Article I's Vesting Clause—"[a]ll legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States"—which holds that Congress can't give up legislative power. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 11:50 pm by Giesela Ruehl
– The withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU has revived the debate on the conflict of corporate laws. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
United States A libel claim brought by a Philadelphia firefighter against the New York Daily News has been dismissed. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
31 May 2024, 7:00 am by Rogier Bartels
Before the military commission set up by the United States for those individuals held in Guantanamo Bay, Mr. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm by Chuck Cosson
“Tool Without A Handle:  A Duty of Candor” The law and legal professional ethics require of counsel a duty of candor in the practice of law.[1]  This includes a duty to not knowingly make false statements of fact, to not conceal controlling legal authority, and to not offer evidence the lawyer knows to be false.[2] These principles are considered essential to maintaining both substantive fairness for participants in the process, and trust in the integrity of the process for… [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
Factoid: Autumn Jackson, who allegedly tried to blackmail Bill Cosby several years ago by threatening to reveal her being his out-of-wedlock child, had her conviction reversed because the judge didn’t instruct the jury about this principle, but the court of appeals later reversed the reversal, because it concluded that the error was harmless, since there was no evidence that Autumn Jackson was just asking for what was rightfully owed her; the above quote is from that case, United… [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 12:56 pm by Eugene Volokh
Factoid: Autumn Jackson, who allegedly tried to blackmail Bill Cosby several years ago by threatening to reveal her being his out-of-wedlock child, had her conviction reversed because the judge didn’t instruct the jury about this principle, but the court of appeals later reversed the reversal, because it concluded that the error was harmless, since there was no evidence that Autumn Jackson was just asking for what was rightfully owed her; the above quote is from that case, United… [read post]