Search for: "United States v. Minnesota" Results 1421 - 1440 of 1,647
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2011, 12:23 pm by Joe Consumer
" The Minneapolis Star-Tribune writes, "When companies like Guidant request and receive federal dollars for products they know to be defective, the United States is committed to aggressively seeking the recovery of those payments," said John Marti, first assistant U.S. attorney in Minnesota. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:21 pm by Robert B. Milligan
Other legislation to prevent intellectual property theft was also introduced including the Deter Cyber Theft Act, which aims to block products that contain intellectual property stolen from U.S. companies by foreign countries from being sold in the United States. [read post]
11 May 2012, 9:42 am by Roy Ginsburg
(It is worth noting that some states—but not Minnesota, in the case of private employers—separately prohibit inquiries regarding criminal history early on in the selection process). [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Even under the appropriately exacting standards of New York Times v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm by Mila Sohoni
United States, the Court addressed an analogous regulatory setup. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
  But would we have preferred the Minnesota procedure in Coleman v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Major Connecticut-based corporations are decamping to other states, reducing their in-state footprint, or being acquired by out-of-state firms, including, most recently, the merger of the Massachusetts-based Raytheon Company with the Connecticut-based United Technologies, with the new company to be headquartered in the Boston area.[16] Here too, relocations are not primarily to the Sun Belt, but toward places like New York City, Boston, and Chicago. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 8:16 am by Cinthia Macie
”  The FTC’s “Made in USA” labeling rule will prohibit marketers from using that designation unless “1) final assembly or processing of the product occurs in the United States; 2) all significant processing that goes into the product occurs in the United States; and 3) all or virtually all ingredients or components of the product are made and sourced in the United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  We therefore, conclude this loss falls within the coverage of the Bond, in accordance with Minnesota law. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 6:12 am
(Delaware Supreme Court and Harvard Law School), on Wednesday, September 12, 2018 Tags: Campaign finance, Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]