Search for: ""citizen's united""
Results 1441 - 1460
of 3,970
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2016, 6:30 am
Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:12 pm
Stanford Social Innovation Review: There is a great deal of discussion about what the Citizens United decision means for elections, campaign finance, and democracy. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:26 am
A pair of groups seeking to speak on behalf of the citizenry is testing that question, asking the Court to give their attorney “as long as one minute” to argue in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:18 pm
Gizmodo – Supreme Court Printer Cartridge Case Could Be the Citizens United of Products “It’s an obscure case that hasn’t received a ton of attention as it has made its way to the Supreme Court but the final verdict could set off a cascade of consequences in the world of consumer products. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:30 am
Charles O’Kelley Americans’ interest in the impact of corporations on society, always high, reached fever pitch with the Supreme Court decisions in Hobby Lobby and Citizens United, as reflected in the ongoing political and media dialogue about reforms necessary to protect or restore democracy. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 6:19 pm
("Rarely," not "never": see Citizens United.)Others have made the first analytic point, that Chief Justice Roberts's effort to distinguish the Court's creation of a new exception to First Amendment coverage is transparently circular. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 5:57 am
The US Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 12:25 am
A recent United States Supreme Court opinion in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Finance National: “Supreme Court Won’t Hear Fight Over SEC’s Pay-To-Play Rule” by Reenat Sinay for law360.com National: “More Money, Less Transparency: A decade under Citizens United” by Karl Evers-Hillstrom for Center for Responsive Politics Washington: “Seattle City Council Bans ‘Foreign-Influenced’ Companies from Most Political Spending” by Daniel Beekman for Seattle Times Elections National: “Doctored… [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 6:15 am
In 2010, the Supreme Court ruled in Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:13 am
(Eugene Volokh) Following Citizens United, I heard many people argue that the Court was wrong because corporations should not be seen as having First Amendment rights — not just that they do have First Amendment rights but that there’s some special compelling interest that justifies restricting corporate speech about candidates, but that corporations aren’t people and therefore can’t have First Amendment rights at all. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:51 am
When Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Campaign Finance National: “GOP Salivates at the Biggest Campaign Finance Win Since Citizens United” by Ally Mutnick and Zach Montellaro (Politico) for Yahoo News Hawaii: “Ex-Maui Rep Pleads No Contest to Campaign Spending Violation” by Kim Gamel for Honolulu Civil Beat Elections Louisiana: “Louisiana First in the Nation to Vote on Banning Private Elections Funding” by Alex Burness for Bolts Michigan: “How… [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:46 pm
Since the 2010 Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 8:00 am
Stephenson Book ReviewsShortlisted: Women in the Shadows of the Supreme CourtThe Campaign Finance Cases: Buckley, McConnell, Citizens United, and McCutcheon.Paul Kens–Dan Ernst [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 8:23 am
In Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:35 am
The stakes for the outcome of Citizens United and the McCain-Feingold law have been raised after the D.C. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 5:59 am
Citizens United and the undue influence of corrupt corporations in this country. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 12:51 am
Based on the oral argument in the Citizens United case (which I previewed here and which is summarized nicely here), it appears that the Supreme Court is likely to overrule the precedents establishing governmental authority to regulate political speech by corporations. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 11:07 am
The For the People Act would: restore the Voting Rights Act,prohibit voter suppression,end partisan gerrymandering,overhaul federal ethics rules,reverse the effects of the Citizens United decision which unleashed corporate treasuries on electionsblock voter suppression bills in states trying to keep extremists in power andprevent other attempts to rig the elections by keeping legitimate voters from the polls.Thus the Act would eliminate rule by an extremist minority and forbid… [read post]
