Search for: "Holm v. Holm"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 1,880
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2011, 11:00 am
I'm not sure how much more I managed in my summary of recent scholarship on Pierson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 11:25 am
Proposición de Nino Bravo (sobre las víctimas): Un beso y una flor, un te quiero, una caricia y un adiós» IX. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:06 am
”The Board acknowledged the ruling in Imperial Holmes Corp v Lamont (1972) on the application of section 101 to architectural drawings. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:30 am
Latham v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 7:47 am
., Dorsey v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:37 pm
Only Justice Holmes served on the Court at a greater age. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:31 pm
Thus for example, in a set of phrases that will be familiar to many readers, Justice Oliver Wendall Holmes wrote in his dissenting opinion in Abrams v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Fans of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle will recognize that iterative disjunctive syllogism is nothing other than the process of elimination, as explained by Doyle’s fictional detective, Sherlock Holmes. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:01 am
One v. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 3:27 am
” By 1917, in Bunting v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Shanks v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 11:59 am
I remember sending her P V Baker QC's great work Snell on Equity’ * many years ago - with a bookmark at the page on secret trusts. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 11:27 pm
Some of you, ignoring that the famous Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote the opinion, brushed Buck v. [read post]
