Search for: "Matter of Arthur" Results 1441 - 1460 of 1,970
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2018, 4:20 pm by Arthur F. Coon
SB 743 was enacted in 2013 to further California’s efforts to reduce GHG emissions by encouraging transit-oriented, infill development – a strategy announced in SB 375, the “Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008. [read post]
23 May 2024, 4:54 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In an opinion filed April 18, and belatedly ordered published on May 15, 2024, the Third District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s order discharging the peremptory writ of mandate that was issued following the Court of Appeal’s earlier direction in Save Our Capitol! [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 10:14 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Per the Court: “The purpose of the exhaustion doctrine is to ensure public agencies are given the opportunity to decide matters within their expertise, respond to objections, and correct any errors before the courts intervene. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 4:44 pm by Kevin LaCroix
During the trial, the D&O insurer filed a Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (JMOL). [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:00 am by admin
  For historians, this is exactly why they matter. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 12:24 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The Court of Appeal’s Opinion SMARA Claim The Court first held as a matter of law that SMARA’s statutory “statement of reasons” requirement did not apply to the County’s wildlife migration corridor overlay zoning ordinance Project because enacting an ordinance changing permitting requirements did not constitute “permitting a use” under the statute’s plain meaning. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:20 pm
Opposition to MDPs The strongest and most persuasive argument against the MDP is that the American Bar Association (or ABA) opposes it, voting overwhelmingly against them in their last meeting addressing the matter. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:56 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The California Supreme Court on November 26, 2019 entered its order denying the depublication requests and declining to review the matter on its own motion. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:22 pm by Arthur F. Coon
” Applying these “murky” CEQA principles to the case before it, and reviewing the matter independently as an issue of law, the Court found the Park Project was properly treated as separate from the NBR Project for CEQA purposes. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 11:00 am by Arthur F. Coon
, everyone – no matter how famous or well-known – deserves to have a thorough and proper introduction, and this CEQA principle applies with even greater force as the “guest’s” stature increases. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The ideological split on supply- or demand-side economics arose when conservatives accused liberals of only caring about demand-side matters, which was never true. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 10:51 am by Arthur F. Coon
The statute’s last sentence, however, expressly permits a lead agency to determine that a resource is a historical resource even when it is neither deemed (as a mandatory matter) nor presumed (subject to rebuttal by a preponderance of the evidence) to be a historical resource under the statute. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 10:14 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Per the Court: “The purpose of the exhaustion doctrine is to ensure public agencies are given the opportunity to decide matters within their expertise, respond to objections, and correct any errors before the courts intervene. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm by cdw
” Week of April 26,  2010: In Favor of the State or Government Thomas Douglas Arthur v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:27 am by William McGrath
Goffer, his brother, Emanuel, and a third defendant, Michael Kimelman, conspired with attorneys Arthur Cutillo and Brien Santarlas, (formerly of the Ropes & Gray law firm) and others. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 9:16 am by Arthur F. Coon and Matthew C. Henderson
  (As a matter of disclosure, Respondent County of Lake was represented in the trial and appellate proceedings in this case by this post’s authors, Miller Starr Regalia attorneys Arthur Coon and Matthew Henderson.) [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:00 am by Mandelman
IN CASE YOUR INTERESTED At 49 years old, and having originally founded my firm back in 1989, it’s been some time since I’ve been asked for a resume, as one might imagine. [read post]