Search for: "Shields v. United States" Results 1441 - 1460 of 2,234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm by Christa Culver
Saudi Arabian Oil Co.Docket: 10-1393Issue(s): (1) Whether the political question doctrine deprives the federal courts of jurisdiction to adjudicate a Sherman Act and Clayton Act damage case against both private and state-owned businesses operating in the United States; and (2) whether the act of state doctrine bars antitrust claims against defendants whose conduct was commercial, and where it came to fruition and had its effect in the United… [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:48 am by Sean Wajert
Unlike the United States and its agencies, federal contractors do not enjoy absolute immunity. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Sensitive information (such as the personal information of borrowers) could be contained in such documents, and regulatory agencies prohibit the disclosure of non-public personal information of borrowers.[6]   LESSON #4 –STATE LAWS PROVIDE A SHIELD AGAINST DIRECTOR AND OFFICER LIABILITY BUT HAVE LIMITATIONS   Numerous state laws provide protection for directors and officers in litigation, but each have limitations. [read post]
6 May 2010, 8:35 am by Katherine Scanlon
Coventry contended that the Florida Viatical Settlements act, in as much as it purported to allow the Office authority over transactions occurring outside of Florida, violated the Dormant Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm by Law Lady
The plans, called Medicare Advantage, are run through private health insurers as an alternative to traditional fee-for-service Medicare plans.Medicare Billing Fraud: DRUG SUPPLIER CAN'T BE LIABLE FOR KEEPING OVERPAYMENTS, COURT RULES, United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 11:12 am by Steven Cohen
Kleen Concepts, LLC – United States District Court – District of Massachusetts – September 1st, 2017) involves an alleged trademark infringement. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 8:41 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  While it is true that there was a ban on asbestos put in place in the 1970s, that ban was later overturned by the United States Supreme Court on grounds that it was enacted without constitutional authority to do so, and there were goods being made with asbestos in the early 1980s. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 8:41 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  While it is true that there was a ban on asbestos put in place in the 1970s, that ban was later overturned by the United States Supreme Court on grounds that it was enacted without constitutional authority to do so, and there were goods being made with asbestos in the early 1980s. [read post]