Search for: "State v. High"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 32,074
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2013, 2:00 am
Johnston v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 12:58 pm
In Conway v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 12:24 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 9:11 am
The ruling rejected a challenge to AB 540, a California law that allows students who have attended California high schools for three years and received their diploma or GED to pay in-state tuition rates at public colleges and universities in California. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:49 am
Today's Massachusetts high court decision in Ramirez v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:02 am
Attorneys fighting for victims of decades-old child sexual abuse, the March 2023 Third District Court of Appeals’ ruling in Doe v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 1:49 am
Despite the need for general guidance on the legal principles in play in determining whether something constitutes a “building”, the relevant test is that laid down in Skerritts of Nottingham v Secretary of State for the Environment Transport and Regions [2000] JPL 1025 and as adopted in the Listed Buildings Act. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:28 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Tamiz (Aka Miah) & Ors v R [2010] EWCA Crim 2638 (12 November 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) RH v South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1273 (12 November 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) BJM v Nathan Eyre & Ors [2010] EWHC 2856 (QB) (12 November 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Abbassi & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary… [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 1:30 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Rheines v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 2397 (26 October 2011) R. v E [2011] EWCA Crim 2393 (06 October 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) The Construction Industry Training Board (aka CITB-Construction Skills) v Beacon Roofing Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1203 (26 October 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Morrissey v McNicholas & Anor [2011] EWHC 2738 (QB) (26 October 2011) High Court (Administrative… [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:40 am
The threshold, therefore, is high. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 7:44 am
The High Court has handed down Judgment in Vitol SA v Beta Renowable SA [2017] EWHC 1734 (Comm) highlighting the importance of ensuring that communication and conduct for the purpose of accepting repudiatory breach is clear and unambiguous. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 6:51 pm
Conclusions In sum, the Bombay High Court laid down the following propositions- (a) Dividend income was ‘income not included in total income’ for the purpose of section 14A (In an interestingly timed development, the Kerala High Court has also upheld this position in CIT v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 8:10 am
On September 16, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 8:18 am
On 16 March 2022, the High Court of England and Wales handed down its judgment following the FRAND trial in InterDigital v Lenovo. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 8:49 pm
We've added a link to the full judgment in Norris v Government of United States. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:06 am
United States; Plessy v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 8:50 am
" Justice Dillon said no reported cases have specifically stated that high-low agreements are settlements and require compliance with CPLR 5003-a. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 6:42 am
In Brantley v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 3:14 pm
Idaho 17-236 Issues: (1) Whether the Eighth Amendment categorically prohibits life-without-parole sentences for juvenile offenders; and (2) whether, when the evidence demonstrates that the plaintiff lacks a prior history of violence and has high potential for rehabilitation, the state’s pre-Miller v. [read post]
