Search for: "State v. Plant" Results 1441 - 1460 of 4,033
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
IN THE NEWS The Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in U.S. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 2:37 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Against the background of recent investment disputes (Philip Morris v Uruguay and Philip Morris v Australia) and recent trade agreements with ISDS norms (the United States – Mexico – Canada Agreement, USMCA, and the EU/Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, CETA), this chapter addresses the impact of ISDS on public health regulation.In Chapter 7, the author discusses how the US shaped the provisions on geographical indications in TPP-11. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:38 am by Alyssa Rosen
Judge Janice Rogers Brown dissented from the ruling, arguing that FERC does not have the authority to take action to reduce the greenhouse gas impact of pipelines it approves, and thus is not obligated to analyze some impacts, stating “[t]he truth is that FERC has no control over whether the power plants that will emit these greenhouse gases will come into existence or remain in operation” (Sierra Club et al. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 10:03 am by Michael Elkon
 The Eastern District of Pennsylvania recently faced just such an issue in CertainTeed Corp. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:08 am by Shari Shapiro
Making factually unsupported arguments may weaken the punch of the USGBC's clearer grounds for dismissal, and provide a toe hold for the Plaintiffs to plant seeds of doubt about the rest of the USGBC's arguments. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 9:38 am by lsammis
§ 893.117, both first degree misdemeanors.After the misdemeanor charges were filed, the State has only 90 days to bring the case to trial unless the defendant waives her rights to a speedy trial. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:52 pm
--Fields v Rainbow Rehab Ctr, Inc, EDMich: Employer's motion for summary judgment GRANTED. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
| Plant variety in Case C‑242/14 | US Supreme Court on Spiderman patent | Hospira v Genentech saga | Are EU policy-makers fighting the right copyright battles? [read post]