Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California" Results 1441 - 1460 of 11,377
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2022, 7:34 am by Shane Peagler
Fitzgerald of the United States District Court for Central District of California fully denying Snap’s Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 12:44 pm by Andrew Hamm
Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit agreed with the governor that state sovereign immunity barred the suit. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 9:03 pm by Soojin Jeong
District Court of the Northern District of California that Apple controls the Apple app store and its practice of keeping a 30 percent commission for competitors’ apps is anticompetitive. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 1:00 pm by John Ross
Dissents: California state law (like 44 other states) prohibits such awards, which also weren't authorized at common law. [read post]
Concepcion barred California’s insistence on a particular process for adjudicating and aggregating claims. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 8:42 am by Ronald Mann
Concepcion barred California’s insistence on a particular process for adjudicating and aggregating claims. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 10:49 am by Amy Howe
However, the justices agreed to address a narrower issue: whether the Arizona Supreme Court’s ruling that a state rule of criminal procedure barred the inmate, John Cruz, from obtaining relief is an adequate and independent state-law ground for the judgment against him. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
Thus, a Court injunction would not have necessarily barred such disclosure. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 3:52 pm
District Court for the Central District of California and at the U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
California – SJ City Council Passes Draft Proposal to Bar Political Donations by Foreign-Owned Corps California Globe – Evan Symon | Published: 3/23/2022 The city council approved a piece of draft legislation to prohibit foreign-influenced corporations from making political contributions to any city elections in San Jose. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 8:53 pm by Richard Reibstein Esq.
Because the issue involved a key state law, the First Circuit chose to ask the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, the highest court in that state, to provide its opinion on the question of whether the FTC Rule preempts the state’s independent contractor law. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 9:44 am by Eugene Volokh
The court assumed the "any person" was a state actor, then held the lawsuit barred by Noerr-Pennington, under which a person cannot be liable under federal law (including a § 1983 constitutional action) for the petition activity of seeking relief in state court. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 9:30 am by Jason Kelley
In late 2020, the California Supreme Court directed the California State Bar to prepare a timetable for destruction of all bar examinees’ personally identifiable information retained by the remote proctoring company (ExamSoft). [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Turning His Campaign into a Super PAC” by Roger Sollenberger for Daily Beast Alaska: “Alaska House Passes Campaign Contribution Limits Bill” by Becky Bohrer (Associated Press) for Alaska Public Media California: “SJ City Council Passes Draft Proposal to Bar Political Donations by Foreign-Owned Corps” by Evan Symon for California Globe Maryland: “Giving from the Grave? [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 1:22 pm by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
Sungaila is a shareholder at Buchalter in California and she noticed that while there were a number of female judges making it onto the trial court bench, there were still a small number at the appellate level. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 11:00 am by Michael McConnell
In any number of cases, the United States Supreme Court has unequivocally held that speech cannot be suppressed merely because those in command regard it as false. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Plaintiffs bring nine claims, alleging violations of their First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights under the Federal Constitution, violations of the California Constitution, and a violation of California’s Bane Act.The court granted the state of California's motion to dismiss, finding that plaintiffs' claims for injunctive and declaratory relief are moot, and that any claim for damages is barred by the 11th Amendment. [read post]