Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 13,833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2014, 11:54 am
On July 9, 2014, in Dilts v. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
Three states, California, Connecticut and New York, have put such statutes into law. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 8:50 am
Yesterday, Whistleblowers in United States ex. rel.Fowler v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 12:16 pm
California law holds that section 17200 does not apply beyond the boundaries of the state, Sullivan, at 15277 (citing Norwest Mortgage, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:04 am
California Court Clarifies Position on Websites and the ADA In a recent case, Martinez v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:19 am
July 17, 2013), the Northern District of California held that the Lanham Act applied to a foreign company even when the manufacturing, advertising, and selling of the trademarked product occurred outside the United States. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 8:36 am
The United States Supreme Court should issue 21 opinions by the end of the month. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:46 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed all eight claims in Low v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 5:24 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 7:18 am
California v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:19 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:50 am
In the existing form of the state labor code, the term alien is used to denote any person who is not a citizen of the United States or a United States national. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 3:03 pm
In a landmark juvenile law case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States, it was decided that a child's confession was not voluntary when he was questioned by school police (two) and two administrators in a closed classroom. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:39 pm
See e.g., United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 10:32 am
Nxtbigthing, LLC – United States District Court – Northern District of California – March 28th, 2016 – In this trademark infringement case, the defendants have filed a motion to exclude the testimony of Joseph A. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:16 pm
A recent case out of Washington State decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit -- Ocampo v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:49 am
§§ 1331, 1362 and 1367, in that plaintiffs claims arise under the laws of the United States, including federal common law, plaintiff is an American Indian tribe with a governing body duly recognized by the Secretary of the Interior as maintaining government-to-government relations with the United States and exercising jurisdiction over the federal trust lands of the Cahuilla Indian Reservation in the unincorporated territory of Riverside County,… [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:57 am
The United States Supreme Court reversed. [read post]
