Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend" Results 1441 - 1460 of 6,907
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2024, 6:33 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This is a very unusual case where the district court granted summary judgment without notice to either party on the eve of trial, prompting an appeal to the Second Circuit, which reinstates the case because things like this just don't happen in federal court.The case is Kowalchuck v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 12:02 am by Mike
Macdonald, said, "I don't think juries should be ';allowed' to do online research. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 12:02 am by Mike
Macdonald, said, "I don't think juries should be ';allowed' to do online research. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 9:58 am
Pretty grim facts in this child porn case certainly don't help in an opinion that spawns a bevvy of new holdings in the field. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 2:01 pm by EPLawyer
  I don't care what someone says, you don't hit. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 2:01 pm by EPLawyer
  I don't care what someone says, you don't hit. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 3:59 am by SHG
  And we don't fret too much about it. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 6:21 am by Jeff Gamso
 And one we don't mention as we issue a celebratory oopsie when we release a wrongfully convicted, innocent person and claim it shows how well the system works.It's also a fantasy. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:00 am by Adrian M. Baron
 "I don't know that lady, I don't know what the facts and circumstances are concerning her son. [read post]
14 May 2009, 6:27 am
Since I don't have access to President Obama's "shortlist," I'll rely on Intrade to tell me the most likely nominees for fill Justice David Souter's seat on the Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 9:02 am
  Now, in private securities litigation speak, this doesn't mean that a jury couldn't find that Collins knew about the fraud and kept going; in fact, the district judge thought that was almost surely true. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 12:00 pm by Orin Kerr
Informants usually have ulterior motives, and judges don't need to be told that. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 6:25 am
But here is the part we don't get:Why afford immunity to someone who has willingly engaged in an illegality? [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 11:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
The fact pattern and the arguments are pretty complicated, and I don't have the time to summarize them here; the opinions I linked to lay it all out. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 7:30 am by Orin Kerr
 Informants usually have ulterior motives, and judges don't need to be told that. [read post]