Search for: "Barnes v. State" Results 1461 - 1480 of 1,759
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2016, 8:19 am by Dennis Crouch
Barnes & Noble, Inc., et al., No. 15-1161 (abstract idea eligibility) [CloudSatchelPetition] Limelight Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am by Adam Chandler
” The New York Law Journal analyzes the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 6:26 am
Robert Barnes has, "Lethal-Injection Ruling May Have to Wait," in the Washington Post. [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:42 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Internet companies should not be able to override state law by contract when there’s a significant state policy interest in protecting state residents. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
The New York Matrimonial Trial Handbook is available in Bookstores and online at the Bookbaby Bookstore,  Amazon,  Barnes & Noble, Goodreads, and other online booksellers. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 6:00 am by Jennifer
Ralph Nader's American Museum of Tort Law in Connecticut also hosts a small online shop, featuring t-shirts depicting the Brown v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:34 pm by Sinead Ring
This  clarification of the Castle Doctrine is most welcome, since under the common law, (most recently outlined People (DPP) v Barnes) the position is not clear (see my previous blog). [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
”  Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that the court could announce today whether it will review a lower court decision holding that Wisconsin’s “redistricting plan violated the Constitution’s First Amendment and equal rights protections because of partisan gerrymandering”; he explains that the case, Gill v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:59 am by Josh Blackman
("[H]urt feelings differ from legal injury"); Barnes-Wallace v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am by Dennis Crouch
Barnes & Noble, Inc., et al., No. 15-1161 (abstract idea eligibility) [CloudSatchelPetition] Eligibility Challenges: Vehicle Intelligence and Safety LLC v. [read post]