Search for: "Bills v. State"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 19,660
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2014, 6:21 am
Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 2:52 pm
Erickson (Tribal Courts; Child Custody) State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 9:25 am
Children, Youth and Families Dept. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2019, 9:13 am
Cojocar v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 9:36 am
Schedule 6 contains modifications to be made to the GDPR articles (e.g., by changing references to member states to refer to the United Kingdom) so that they will continue to apply after Brexit. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 7:25 pm
Samsung and FTC v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 12:40 pm
In Derrickson v. [read post]
28 Apr 2025, 5:06 am
It is well-settled that “[i]f a defendant client’s legal malpractice claim is intertwined with a plaintiff law firm’s claim for legal fees, the plaintiff will not be entitled to summary judgment on its account stated claim” (Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP v Rose, 111 AD3d 453, 454 [1st Dept 2013]) and since the “alleged conduct which forms the basis for the malpractice [counterclaims] occurred during the billing period at… [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 7:30 am
Pereira v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
United States (Arizona's likely appeal to the Supreme Court of United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 12:15 am
Almond All. of California v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 6:49 am
In Commonwealth of Kentucky v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 7:34 pm
Two of the many defendants in the ill-fated Rakofsky v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
The 1946 Supreme Court decision in SEC v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 8:43 am
Under Grutter v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 8:36 am
He’s Wrong * Senate’s “Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act of 2017”–and Section 230’s Imminent Evisceration * The “Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017” Bill Would Be Bad News for Section 230 * WARNING: Draft “No Immunity for Sex Traffickers Online Act” Bill Poses Major Threat to Section 230 * The Implications of Excluding State Crimes from 47 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 12:22 pm
Stuffed into an 835-page federal transportation bill and given just 20 minutes of discussion by legislators in the House of Representatives, the measure preempted state vicarious liability laws in personal injury cases with regard to vehicle owners who rent or lease vehicles. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 11:50 am
Previously, the state adhered to the Frye standard, which was established by the 1923 case of Frye v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 8:26 pm
The state statute codified into law the California Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
