Search for: "Character v. State"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 6,778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2015, 10:43 pm
The Court rejected this plea as well stating that the fact remains that if an applicant claims that a trade mark applied for is distinctive, despite OHIM’s analysis, it is for that applicant to provide specific and substantiated information to show that the trade mark applied for has an intrinsic distinctive character. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 4:00 am
As a result, it was deemed devoid of any distinctive character, with its registration precluded by Article 7(1)(b). [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:56 am
Tao Licensing, LLC v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 12:54 pm
Mobley v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 6:24 am
Seuss v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:54 am
One such case is Bailey v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 9:07 am
The United States Supreme Court held in Palmore v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 12:24 pm
In Wyeth v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 6:30 am
Peck, cases on state bills of credit in the Jacksonian era, the Legal Tender cases, and Pollock v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:59 pm
These circumstances were paramount in the Court's reasoning that, considering the weak distinctive character of the earlier MAGNET 4 mark, the word MAGNET could be descriptive of the characteristics of the goods protected by the Spanish mark, in particular games and toys: it was common ground that magnets had been used for a long time in toys and that there was even a Commission Decision 2008/329 of 21 April 2008 which required Member States to impose the display of… [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:10 am
In class 43, the following three trade marks were the first ones filed by Hunan Chayue: The verbal elements of the three respective trade marks (‘TM Bs’) all have only one character that differs from the TM A:TM A: ‘茶 (tea) 颜 (face) 观 (observe) 色 (colour)’ v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:46 am
These conditions are also cumulative (Gateway v OHIM, C‑57/08 P). [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 10:47 am
Krzykalski v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 4:05 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 9:14 am
In Everson v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:28 am
Each nominee, however, must be judged on the totality of their views, character, and opinions. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:00 am
New York State's Civil Service Law §75(1) provides an employee in the classified service of a public employer covered by the statute "shall not be removed or otherwise subjected to any disciplinary penalty except for incompetency or misconduct shown after a hearing upon stated charges"; and 2. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:57 am
Cano v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 10:00 am
Temporary appointments Coxen v. [read post]
5 Oct 2024, 6:23 am
State v. [read post]
