Search for: "McDONALD v. STATE"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 1,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2024, 2:07 pm
Supreme Court in New York State Rifle & Pistol Asssoc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 11:43 am
(That absence was made even more apparent by the presence in the audience of Justice Clarence Thomas, who in McDonald v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 7:25 am
The most famous example of this strategy is used by McDonalds, which has successfully argued that any other company that attached "Mc" to their product, like a McPhone, is creating consumer confusion that the McPhone is a McDonald's product. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 6:46 am
State v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:24 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance] Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: Center v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:34 am
In Hartfield v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 12:47 pm
This is a version of the argument from United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 1:17 pm
The case is Reilly v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 12:11 pm
Mauia v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
(Spicy IP) ‘Tirupati laddus’ granted registration as a geographical indication (Spicy IP) Malaysia Malaysian Federal Court: McDonald’s final defeat by McCurry in trade mark battle (IPKat) Netherlands District Court of The Hague: Procter & Gamble companies win trade mark infringement summary proceedings brought by Debonairre against their Naomi Campbell product line (Class 46) South Africa Copycat success - Supreme… [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
His successor could take a broader view of the extent to which federal law controls, which would allow fewer state-law tort suits to proceed. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 6:20 am
., on Friday, April 5, 2019 Tags: Board composition, Board leadership, Boards of Directors, California, Diversity, Institutional Investors, Institutional voting, Proxy advisors, SB 826, State law, Surveys Review and Analysis of 2018 U.S. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 7:36 pm
McDonald & Elaine A. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 7:45 am
McDonald, WHEN THE BANKRUPTCY CODE, FEDERAL SECURITIES LAW AND STATE CORPORATIONS LAW COLLIDE: PART I, 26-JUN Am. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 6:56 am
State v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
I assume the same would hold true for the court’s ruling in McDonald v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
”The Court Apparently Scraps its DictumHeller’s statement about the endurance of felon-in-possession laws was consistent with the Court’s ruling in that case and McDonald, but it seems flatly inconsistent with last year’s decision in New York State Pistol & Rifle Association v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 2:35 am
The case of Target Australia Pty Ltd v Catchoftheday.com.au Pty Ltd [2015] ATMO 54, decided in June, aimed to answer this question in the fair land of Australia. [read post]
