Search for: "Price v. State"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 11,975
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2007, 8:46 am
The contract had a term of one year and mechanisms for price renegotiation based upon market changes. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:12 pm
The case of Douglas v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 4:03 am
Securities fraud under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 may be "a catchall provision," the Second Circuit observes in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 12:35 pm
Kennedy-Western University CA Appeals Court: Claims Under State Spam Statute Not Preempted by CAN-SPAM Category: Product #: Regular price:$ (Sale ends !) [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 3:45 pm
MSRP policies are lawful under United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:46 am
In support of this, he cited the view of Mr Justice Colman in Navigas v Enron. [read post]
21 May 2024, 2:45 am
SES is the registered proprietor of the EP 3883277 (EP 277), which relates to the spatial arrangement of components within electronic shelf labels that display price information in sales areas. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 1:17 pm
("CREI") (previously known as Cole Credit Property Trust III ("CCPT III") is a non-traded real estate investment trust that owns real estate throughout the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:10 am
Briefly: At Balkinization, Zach Price weighs in on Puerto Rico v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 6:43 pm
Ronwin); and (3) a board controlled by attorneys prohibits attorney advertising and deters attorneys from engaging in price competition (Bates v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:42 am
Dependable Sales & Service, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:14 am
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 12:09 pm
and Fegley v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 6:57 am
The medical association's motion maintains that the suit, filed in April by egg donor Lindsay Kamakahi, fails to state a claim under antitrust law because it does not contest the basic rationale for the price limits, which were imposed to address ethical concerns. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:19 am
Phillips v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 3:13 pm
By Jason Rantanen VirnetX, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:30 pm
For example, the Commissioner cites United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 8:42 am
The Court reversed a lower court decision and found that a family of California raisin growers deserved just compensation after the state impounded parts of their crops in a price-support program. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 5:47 am
In a decision issued on April 21, 2008, Bell BCI Company v, United States, the United States Court of Federal Claims issued a decision that can only be described as a “slam dunk” for the contractor. [read post]
