Search for: "Sharp v. State" Results 1461 - 1480 of 2,618
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
 The Dutch court's reasoning in the parallel case was consistent with the English Court (save they actually granted the relief sought, whereas Kitchin J held that the case for the declaration was arguable) (see Merck Sharpe & Dohme Manufacturing v Ratiopharm Nederland BV and others - February 13 2008 case number/docket number 288241/ HA ZA 07-1689).A new mantra for those clearing the path? [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The report, a first of its kind, found that existing surveillance law is being eroded by six factors: the introduction of new laws that expand state surveillance powers; lack of legal precision and privacy safeguards in existing surveillance legislation; increased supply of new surveillance technologies that enable illegitimate surveillance; state agencies regularly conducting surveillance outside of what is permitted in law; impunity for those committing illegitimate acts of… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:43 am
By Mike Dorf In my first Verdict column, I discuss last week's Supreme Court decision in Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC ("AFECFCP") v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 8:22 am
Ohio has a history with these “Trust Mills” but ever since Cleveland Bar Association v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 6:23 am
Finally, Justice Brennan in New York Times v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 5:08 pm
Today they write: Europe and the United States must make clear to Mr. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 1:15 am
Whether this is a sharp or blunt instrument depends on how this will be handled in practice. [read post]