Search for: "Sharpe v. State" Results 1461 - 1480 of 2,598
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2007, 2:20 pm
Scott Nelson has this post at the Consumer Law & Policy Blog about the Court's unanimous decision in Watson v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The report, a first of its kind, found that existing surveillance law is being eroded by six factors: the introduction of new laws that expand state surveillance powers; lack of legal precision and privacy safeguards in existing surveillance legislation; increased supply of new surveillance technologies that enable illegitimate surveillance; state agencies regularly conducting surveillance outside of what is permitted in law; impunity for those committing illegitimate acts of… [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 6:19 am by Florian Mueller
But that doesn't have to prevent the parties from engaging in constructive dialog, or multilateral talks that would also involve the United States and the United Kingdom.Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 1:15 am
Whether this is a sharp or blunt instrument depends on how this will be handled in practice. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 10:07 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court’s decision in Financial Oversight and Management Bd. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:43 am
By Mike Dorf In my first Verdict column, I discuss last week's Supreme Court decision in Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC ("AFECFCP") v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 8:22 am
Ohio has a history with these “Trust Mills” but ever since Cleveland Bar Association v. [read post]