Search for: "United States v. Christian" Results 1461 - 1480 of 1,921
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Nor is likely to be a path to the Presidency of the United States of America. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:19 am by Adam Chandler
Finally, Wendy Kaminer has a piece for the Atlantic on the federal sex offender case, United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
No. 4J, 301 Or. 358 (1986), appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question, 480 U.S. 942 (1987) (over the dissenting votes of Brennan, Marshall, & O'Connor, JJ.); United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 7:48 am
Supreme Court - United States - Law - Government - Supreme Court of the United States [read post]
30 May 2015, 10:28 pm
  Communities of marginalized people--African-Americans a generation or more ago in the United States for example--understood the need to avoid the "self" for fear that majority white populations would deploy violence against those who stood out. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 7:14 am by Eugene Volokh
Nor does the fact that this involves Islamic law, as opposed to Jewish law or Christian law as understood by particular Christian arbitrators, affect the analysis. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 1:43 pm by Sandy Levinson
  (Though one might be reminded of Tertullian’s statement that he believed in Christian doctrine because it was absurd. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 5:22 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Brasher, 776 S.W.2d 567, 570 (Tex. 1989) (explaining that "[a]ll assertions of opinion are protected by the first amendment of the United States Constitution and article I, section 8 of the Texas Constitution"). [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
United States: A couple from Texas have been awarded $13.8 million in a defamation case against anonymous posters on the internet forum Topix.com, who had accused them of being sexual deviants, molesters, and drug dealers reports ABC News. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am by INFORRM
The roadmap expressly states it is not a guide to future compliance, but rather an information document setting out Ofcom’s present thinking. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 10:00 pm
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDATHE FLORIDA BAR,Complainant,v. [read post]