Search for: "AMENDMENT TO RULES FOR MANAGEMENT OF COURT FUND" Results 1481 - 1500 of 2,644
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
Florida, a court may impose a per se rule precluding the application of equitable tolling to a 28 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
” To the extent that the state court based its ruling on the absence of evidence of deficiencies in adaptive functioning, the Court ruled that this was likewise unreasonable. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by John Gregory
Petitions are a way of being heard, if not quite a day in court. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 2:54 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Over the past year, the Obama Administration also has amended its FMLA regulations to make clear that the Obama Administration expects private sector employers covered by the FMLA to offer family leave to same-sex domestic partners on the same terms as for heterosexual married couples in the wake of the Supreme Court’s Windsor decision. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 3:06 am by Lyle Denniston
That is, for the court’s majority, a matter of strong principle under the First Amendment’s free-speech guarantee. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 6:39 am by Joy Waltemath
According to the employee, the DPW manager engaged in a scheme to subvert the city charter by hiring temporary employees only for special projects or professional services with limited funding. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 7:21 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Expanded DACA and the new DAPA programs now seem dead on arrival unless the Fifth Circuit or the Supreme Court lifts an injunction by a federal judge in Texas. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 10:25 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(i.e., collateral attack on an earlier court finding of no invalidity)(Presumably this is directed at the hedge fund filings. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 6:30 am by Jim Sedor
A majority also reject the argument that political money is a form of speech protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
29 May 2015, 7:37 am by Benjamin Wittes
The Fifth Amendment is entirely mooted, as Courts have already ruled that only something you know is protected thereunder, not something you are or have—that is to say that production of devices under subpoena cannot be thwarted. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
It left to me and a few others the more difficult task of promoting interest in the long-range and less understood value of prudent management of a resource as rare and fragile as the collection of a large research library. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:50 pm by nedaj
  The Division of Investment Management of the SEC issued an Investment Management Guidance Update regarding whether certain key employee trusts would qualify as “Family Clients” under Rule 202(a)(11)(G)-1 of the Advisers Act (the “Family Office Rule”). [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:50 pm by nedaj
  The Division of Investment Management of the SEC issued an Investment Management Guidance Update regarding whether certain key employee trusts would qualify as “Family Clients” under Rule 202(a)(11)(G)-1 of the Advisers Act (the “Family Office Rule”). [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:35 am by Juan C. Antúnez
With the trial court having granted our wealthy opponent’s demurrer without leave to amend, our disinherited client’s case was entirely in the hands of the court of appeal. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:05 am by WIMS
The Appeals Court  said, ". . .we disagree that the Eleventh Amendment bars the assertion of federal court jurisdiction over plaintiffs' claims, and we remand for resolution of the case's status and the possible need to resolve a litany of other issues concerning the viability of the complaint. [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:10 am by WIMS
(collectively, "Resource Investments") appeal the Court of Federal Claims' ("Claims Court") dismissal of their Fifth Amendment takings claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
  Especially in the context of the management of behaviors at universities, sexual assault constitutes a new frontier of managing cultural norms through law. [read post]
13 May 2015, 8:58 am by WIMS
In the Michigan Court of Appeals, Case No. 318388. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm by Brian E. Barreira
  Neither the details of the trust nor its funding details nor the actual case are provided to back up the applicability of many of the quotes in the MassHealth Essay. [read post]