Search for: "California v. United States" Results 1481 - 1500 of 12,562
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2019, 9:55 am by Gene Takagi
AB 5 modifies how workers are classified as employees or independent contractors for state law purposes and codifies the 2018 California Supreme Court decision known as Dynamex. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  But we believe that United States Supreme Court has spoken on the issue, and we are required to follow its binding authority. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 8:18 pm by Daniel Richman
United States, waded back into Apprendi land to overrule the long-beleaguered Harris v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 8:14 am by Jon Ibanez
” According to the United States Supreme Court, two things must occur before Miranda Rights attach; 1.) a custody and, 2.) an interrogation. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 5:18 pm by INFORRM
People of the State of New York v Griepp 18-2454-cv, a case considering whether an injunction was warranted against several abortion protestors for protests outside an abortion clinic in Queens. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 6:04 pm by Mike Danko
But at least 45 plaintiffs joined in a suit filed in California federal court in a case entitled Zhang v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:20 am by Brooke Miller
 Together these two court rulings, issued on the same day, reinforce the primacy of CEQA in challenging development projects throughout the State. [1]  Save Berkeley’s Neighborhood v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 6:18 pm
  Shortly after Payments IP moved to intervene in the California Case, Payments IP filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland (the “Maryland Case”), asserting claims similar to those asserted by Payments IP in the California Case, including a claim for declaratory judgment regarding ownership of the Domain. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:45 am by John Ellis
On June 15, 2022, the United States Supreme Court issued its much anticipated decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]