Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 3,853
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
In the meantime, the United States SupremeCourt took up the lethal injection issue in Baze v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 1:08 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 2:40 pm
., v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 4:18 pm
On Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments for Apple v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON TAGNETICS, INC., Appellant, v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 12:14 pm
Rather, patent holder claims that the statute should only apply to accused infringers who “make, use, offer to sell, or sell within the United States or import into the United States a patented invention. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 1:39 am
DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Criminal Practice Cocaine, Crack Distribution Conspirator's Sentence Reduced to 240-Month Mandatory Minimum Term United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 3:39 am
After receiving the stolen data, [she] re-sold the information to her co-conspirators in the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 6:08 pm
In addition to preventing admission to the United States by individuals from select countries, provisions of the original order included references to permanent resident aliens—that is, non-citizens with lawful status, sometimes referred to as green card holders. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:45 am
” Indeed, as the court stated in 2010 in Holder v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 10:04 pm
Elsewhere, in the United Kingdom, for instance, a period of five years is and was relevant. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:09 am
Continuing the coverage of Tuesday’s oral argument in Holder v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:13 pm
Holder, 10-545 (which had been relisted twice). [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 9:40 am
Cir. 2007), the Federal Circuit held that US patent rights are only exhausted “through a first sale in the United States. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 5:08 am
Johnson was the common unit holder ofXYZ Partners, and he was also appointed to be its managing member. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 2:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 May 2018, 2:58 pm
Fina was distinguishedIn Fina Research, the declaratory plaintiff was a foreignentity that was manufacturing and selling an ingredientof drilling mud abroad; the holder of United Statespatents on compositions containing the drilling mud hadsent letters to the foreign producer, stating that thepatentee would sue for infringement if the ingredientwere introduced in the United States. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 4:42 am
California and United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 6:01 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:30 am
— In Robertson v. [read post]
