Search for: "Holder v. United States" Results 1481 - 1500 of 4,276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2008, 8:06 am
Those new restrictions were imposed by the Commission measure and the member States implementing it were left with no discretion as to how to apply it (see, Case C-386/96 P Dreyfus v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:58 pm by National Indian Law Library
United States (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act)Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:15 am by David Post
So if you buy 1000 copies of a copyright-protected work in Singapore and attempt to bring them into the United States, even if those copies are being sold with the authority of the copyright holder, you need an additional authorization from the copyright holder for the importation; without that authorization, you will be violating the copyright holder’s exclusive right to distribute copies of the work. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:42 am by Peter Margulies
In 2010, the Supreme Court laid down the law on speech and material support in Holder v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm by Stone Law, P.C.
§ 602(a)(1).That section provides that importing goods into the United States without the authority of the copyright holder is illegal. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 9:04 am by Florian Mueller
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington awarded Motorola Mobility, in a FRAND case brought by Microsoft, less than one-twentieth of a percent of its original demand. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 8:42 am
Toys "R" Us, Inc., has interpreted the first sale doctrine to cover both (1) copies manufactured aboard but first sold in the United States and (2) copies manufactured abroad but first sold in the United States with the American copyright owner's permission. [read post]
26 May 2022, 2:16 pm by Dan Rodriguez
Judge Crotty takes from a not especially prominent Supreme Court case from a dozen years ago, Holder v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:45 am by Andrew Koppelman
In his motion to dismiss in Pedersen v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 8:56 pm by Benjamin Wittes
First, both Holder and the White Paper argue, the individual must pose an imminent threat of violent attack against the United States. [read post]