Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 1481 - 1500 of 5,560
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2015, 12:01 pm by CJLF Staff
  Denny Walsh of the Sacramento Bee reports on the high court's decision in People v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 10:36 am
Shortly afterwards, in September of that year, she rented an apartment in Manhattan with two other people. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 10:44 am by Christine Bechtold
The idea behind this amendment is that a defendant should have the opportunity to cross-examine and challenge the credibility of people making statements about him. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 12:12 pm
  Right up to the point he searched the car.At that point, he crossed the line. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am by Blog  Editorial
Judgment reserved. 16:06: Re the cross-appeal – the Judges in the Court below were correct to conclude that the cross-appeal had been properly dealt with by the letter the Government sent. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
  What these people had demonstrated during this period of time was that they did not recognize the sovereignty of the People’s Republic of China over HKSAR, and they did not support the policy of the “One Country, Two systems”. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am by INFORRM
XJA v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2010] EWHC 3174 (QB) at [15]. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 8:01 pm
” Sure, people are free to criticize Mr. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:23 am by Walter Olson
[cross-posted from Point of Law] Tags: humor, Supreme Court, Twitter Related posts Microblog 2008-11-03 (3) Wyeth v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  But there cross examination by requesting party is available. [read post]