Search for: "People v. Olds" Results 1481 - 1500 of 10,179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2010, 7:47 am by Steven M. Gursten
  What made the old law under Kreiner so frustrating for lawyers was that the focus on duration and temporal factors meant that people who suffered very serious injuries of near total incapacitation but shorter duration were punished, as were good people who tried, despite the pain and medical restrictions of their injuries, to gut it out and try to get back to work as quickly as possible. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
Say, for instance, that the government argues that restrictions on handgun possesion by 18-to-20-year-olds are constitutional, based on data about gun crime by people in that age group (an argument that the district court seemed to accept, though in a somewhat procedurally complicated context, in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 9:36 am by Steve Hall
  Here's an extended excerpt:Chris Meadoux, who turns 20 on Oct. 1, is serving life in prison without the possibility of parole for slaying two people in 2007 when he was 16 years old. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 8:13 am
He said that a child went to an old wise man with a bird in his hand and asked the man if it was dead or alive. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| The IPKat and his friends | GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II | Allfiled UK Ltd v Eltis & 16 Others | OAEE 'victims' mark in Greece | Icons, flags and the Hazzards of intellectual property toxicity | Why Finland is not Silicon Valley | The Sofa Workshop Ltd v Sofaworks Ltd | The Ukulele Orchestra of Great Britain v Clausen & Another (t/a the United Kingdom Ukulele Orchestra) | Sony/ATV Music… [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 12:46 pm by Eric Goldman
” BPI responded by citing the old (and terrible) 11th Circuit metatags case, North American Medical v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:06 pm by CJLF Staff
Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:57 am by SHG
 While deeply passionate people are kvelling over the Supreme Court’s 7-1 opinion in Foster v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 9:15 am
Both plaintiffs, who are 47 and 50 years old and have extensive experience in the finance industry, were demoted, stripped of job responsibilities, and placed under the supervision of people considerably junior to them. [read post]