Search for: "State v. All"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 115,194
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2015, 7:21 am
United States? [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
But even if a state legislature were to adopt this misguided measure, Bush v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 9:23 am
On April 26, 2011, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Sorrell v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am
The Court however reiterated that a Member State which had granted or sought to be allowed to grant aid under one of the exceptions provided for in the Treaty rules had a duty to cooperate with the Commission in the proceeding in which it took part, pursuant to which it must in particular provided all the information necessary to enable the Commission to verify that the conditions for the derogation sought were fulfilled (Case C‑364/90 Italy v Commission [1993];… [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 5:31 pm
ConAgra Foods RDM v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:30 am
David Rubenstein’s recent article pushes us to view with a critical eye how these two doctrines work in concert to preempt swaths of state law, all without congressional action. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 9:58 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 8:40 am
Since 1990, the insured in Nooter Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:52 pm
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 6:44 pm
As of October 2, that number had dropped to 13, and all of them are located in Georgia. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:07 am
What does all of this mean for the Supreme Court’s resolution of IRAP v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 2:09 am
See, North Carolina v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 8:52 am
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In her very brief opinion and order in Lee v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:29 am
Regina (Elam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 29; [2012] WLR (D) 14 “The licence expiry date applicable to a prisoner serving consecutive terms of imprisonment including at least one term of 12 months or more was to be determined by the provisions of section 264(3) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 unless all the offences for which the sentences were imposed had been committed before section 264 came into force on 4 April 2005; in such a case, section… [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
The second case cited was Shapiro v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 8:48 am
Welch v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 10:27 am
In a decision surprising no one, a unanimous Court,, per Justice Ginsburg (of course), held in Fort Bend County v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 6:33 am
This case asks the Second Circuit to get around that exemption, but the Circuit will not do so.The case is Wyckoff v. [read post]
