Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 10,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2017, 10:17 am
Holder v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 9:05 pm
Adams, plaintiff brought suit in 2005 against defendant Mary Noel Adams stemming from defendant’s use of the trademark PHASE FORWARD.After the Trademark Dilution Revision Act was enacted in October 2006, defendant moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff’s mark did not meet the amended definition of a “famous mark” as one “widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United… [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
From across the border, Canadians have been watching the fallout from recent decisions from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:43 pm
King, where the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling that will have major implications on searches and seizures. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:28 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Judge Liam O'Grady) affirmed the TTAB's decision of January 20, 2020 [TTABlogged here], dismissing a petition for cancellation of a registration of the mark SHUSTOV & Design (shown below) for various alcoholic beverages. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 3:01 am
Belmora says that one need not own a trademark in the United States to bring a Section 43(a) claim (Bayer owned the mark FLANAX in Mexico). [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 3:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 8:02 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:03 am
Before turning to the proceedings scheduled for this coming week, I wish to update observers interested in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am
United States by an equally divided court. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 5:19 am
Opposer provided no evidence of market share in the United States, and its evidence of media attention was not probative regarding reputation of the mark in this country. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 9:10 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 9:07 pm
First, Smiley alleges that these Counts present no case or controversy as required by the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C § 2201, and Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:08 pm
United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193 (1977). [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 12:54 pm
United Airlines. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
* Swedes consider the "penal value" of a trade mark infringementProsecutor General v CS (Case B-5484-13) is a trade mark infringement ruling where the Swedish Supreme Court addresses criminal consequences of IP infringement. [read post]
7 May 2015, 5:51 pm
On May 5, 2015, in Kelly v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
But since it has no home State in the United States, that means that in that situation, there’s no place for plaintiffs to come together and sue that person, correct? [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:36 am
A recent decision by Judge Mark S. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 7:44 am
United States, 2015 U.S. [read post]
