Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 6,883
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2009, 3:42 pm
When we say that judges "enforce the law," all we really mean is that they make people do things we don't want to do. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 11:25 am
March 23, 2012): "defendants' passive websites alone do not provide a basis for jurisdiction. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 7:29 pm
I don't know. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 5:36 pm
We readily conceded that we're not constitutional scholars - but we stoutly maintained, then and now, that we don't play on this blog. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 2:24 pm
According to the opinion, the plaintiffs also don’t claim they were misled, and this wasn’t an antitrust case. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 10:04 am
Rather, it's a fundamental proposition that extends to all aspects of diversity cases.Needless to say, as defense lawyers we're 100% in favor of anything that keeps federal judges from boldly finding liability where no state court judge has done before. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 3:54 pm
I therefore don't want to offer any opinion on the case, since I wouldn't be able to do so in the objective academic way that our readers generally expect; but the court's decision seemed so interesting that I thought I'd just share this excerpt with our readers without substantive comment [read post]
31 Dec 2024, 12:44 pm
" Some say you should never ask a question at trial that you don't know the answer to. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 4:01 pm
So I don't know. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 1:01 am
As for the latter, I still don't expect any injunction against a network operator actually to be denied in a case in which the patent holder makes a licensing offer that is not facially absurd. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 5:53 am
We think there are just some extreme situations in which drug safety doesn't count for all that much. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 5:11 am
We don't want that. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:02 am
But the liberals don't have a vision. [read post]
5 May 2015, 6:00 am
We didn't want to treat them in an over-delicate manner, as if afraid to engage. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 11:13 am
I just don't especially see a substantive one here. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 10:20 am
[The government gets to pick and choose which speech it displays on its property, and doesn't have to give others a right to reply (except in public fora, which don't include school walls).] [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 11:32 pm
That's because the ITC can only ban products, but it can't order a defendant to pay the complainant any money. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 5:30 am
Related StoriesHeroic Legislator Defends Right to Public SwearingNo, You Don't Have to Swear an Oath to Hold Public OfficeInsufficient-Burping Defense Fails to Defeat DUI Charge [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 11:22 am
Xiaomi won the vote (I don't even want to think about what would have happened in the other event).Transparency in connection with the "ND" in FRAND was a major issue. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 11:40 am
"Didn't we discuss this already? [read post]
