Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 6,907
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2024, 6:16 am
Because this is not an enforce-but-don't-defend case, we still don't appear to have adversarial interests between the parties. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 11:32 pm
That's because the ITC can only ban products, but it can't order a defendant to pay the complainant any money. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:20 pm
And we need judges to rule early in litigation (like here and here) so that defendants—especially small businesses and startups—don’t have to spend millions to defeat a bad patent. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 8:08 am
Sometimes people don't want the peaceful transfer of power when they lose elections. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 11:22 am
Xiaomi won the vote (I don't even want to think about what would have happened in the other event).Transparency in connection with the "ND" in FRAND was a major issue. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 6:52 pm
To the unhappy people who try to make others unhappy, don't bother trying to bring me down, it's too late. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 12:30 pm
Fifth Circuit: We can't consider either claim. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 1:46 pm
Unfortunately, this case never went to trial because the defendant pled guilty so we don't know what the appellate court would have done had the judge's decision been appealed. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:24 am
She played for jurors about 30 seconds of Journey's "Don't Stop Believing. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 10:08 am
" I don't believe the reason the program has few black folks in it is that there weren't enough minority prosecutors in decision making slots. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 11:22 am
We don't represent generic drug manufacturers (this case might rank even higher if we did), but for those who do, this is a really bad decision. [read post]
8 May 2017, 7:44 am
The Defendant: Just – I don’t know. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:02 am
But the liberals don't have a vision. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:54 am
We applaud Judge Worcester's refusal to adhere to precedent because we don't like the precedent. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 2:24 pm
According to the opinion, the plaintiffs also don’t claim they were misled, and this wasn’t an antitrust case. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 6:01 am
A judge would, as I understand it, have to resign her bench to run for D.A., so I don't think it's likely that Velasquez, Fields, Thomas, or Anderson will run. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 5:19 pm
Bonta, decided today by Judge Roger Benitez (S.D. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 11:25 am
March 23, 2012): "defendants' passive websites alone do not provide a basis for jurisdiction. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 8:30 am
Don't settle without the written document. [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:40 am
Q: Could it be that it's because we couldn't agree on a plea agreement that you preferred? [read post]
