Search for: "Allen v. Allen"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 3,914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm
(See also People v Abney, 13 NY3d 251, 267 [2011].)Since LeGrand, the Court of Appeals has reversed the trial court’s exclusion of eyewitness expert testimony in two cases People v Abney and People v Santiago (17 NY3d 661 [2011]) In Santiago, the Court held that the testimony of two additional eyewitness identification witnesses did not sufficiently corroborate the victim's identification of the defendant and did not obviate the need… [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm
(See also People v Abney, 13 NY3d 251, 267 [2011].)Since LeGrand, the Court of Appeals has reversed the trial court’s exclusion of eyewitness expert testimony in two cases People v Abney and People v Santiago (17 NY3d 661 [2011]) In Santiago, the Court held that the testimony of two additional eyewitness identification witnesses did not sufficiently corroborate the victim's identification of the defendant and did not obviate the need… [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm
The variable VaRp expresses the value at risk given a particular probability of a loss as the product of −zp, standard deviation (σ), and the total value of the portfolio (v): VaRp = −zp · σ · v The negative sign before −zp allows us to state value at risk as a positive sum at risk of loss. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:45 am
I'm sure it was more interesting than the snoozer of a debate last night in which the Supreme Court didn't come up.The DP case before the Supreme Court was Hurst v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm
The variable VaRp expresses the value at risk given a particular probability of a loss as the product of −zp, standard deviation (σ), and the total value of the portfolio (v): VaRp = −zp · σ · v The negative sign before −zp allows us to state value at risk as a positive sum at risk of loss. [read post]
6 Oct 2006, 12:49 pm
Allen, 397 U.S. 337 (1970)). [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:44 pm
And so it was for the defendants in Thompson v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:06 am
(Eugene Volokh) Last year, I blogged about Moore v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:22 pm
Allen, 450 F.3d 1072, 1080-81 (9th Cir.2006); Trout Unlimited v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:22 pm
Allen. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 4:54 pm
My father used to say (quoting, apparently, Woody Allen) that 80% of life was just showing up. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 6:50 am
Allen Holmes, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 4:36 am
Reporting on yesterday's COA ruling in the case of In The Estate of Martha O'Neal by Personal Representative Therese Newkirk v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 8:51 am
Atlas Corp. (1988) and Unocal v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 2:15 am
Allen (the applicant) did not disclose it in the application. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 9:24 am
Allen, 2014 U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:02 am
LEXIS 82652 (WD NC, June 12, 2013), a North Carolina federal district court granted an inmate's motion that both the court and the Bureau of Prisons recognize his newly adopted Islamic name, but only along with the name under which he was committed.In Allen v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 3:24 pm
Allen, 956 F.3d 355, 357–58 (6th Cir. 2020). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:05 am
Judge Allen devotes a fair amount of time to discussing the estrangement issue and the opinion has a strong flavor of Judge Cirillo’s famous opinion in Milne v. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 10:04 am
Piester, LLC v. [read post]
