Search for: "Sharpe v. State" Results 1501 - 1520 of 2,598
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
  In addition to applying the Dagenais/Mentuck test to the issue of court exhibits, the Supreme Court at long last held that the test it stated years ago in Vickery v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 11:07 am by Giles Peaker
Any enhanced or modified statutory protections which do exist are expressly stated in EA 2010 and are limited to specific circumstances, for example, the discrimination provisions unique to pregnancy and maternity. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am by INFORRM
US states are considering tightening regulations. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 8:49 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The United States Supreme Court distinguished Robinson in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2017, 12:23 pm by Bill Otis
 After legislative revisions in the states, it was re-instituted in 1976 by a 7-2 vote in Gregg v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
Mercks clash over law governing coexistence dealThe Merck v Merck trade mark dispute (real name: Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and others) has already appeared a couple of times on this weblog [see here and here], with the further honour to have a dedicated poll on who between the Germans and the Americans should have right to use that much-contended name. [read post]
13 Aug 2023, 8:54 am by Kevin LaCroix
In a June 29, 2023, decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has handed down a number of recent rulings: Resolution Statement 0782-18 Wilson v thesun.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2018), 1 Accuracy (2018), Resolved – IPSO mediation Resolution Statement 07827-18 Wilson v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), Resolved – IPSO mediation 06605-18 McPartlin and Corbett v Woman, 2 Privacy (2018), No breach – after investigation 06604-18 McPartlin and Corbett v Now, 2 Privacy (2018), No breach – after… [read post]