Search for: "State v. Murphy " Results 1501 - 1520 of 2,307
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am by NL
Lips v Older was a case presented and argued as common law negligence only, apparently without the existence of the duty being disputed.In relation to Rimmer and Targett, the Claimant argued that issue was a positive duty of the landlord not to take steps to create a dangerous state of affairs and that this remained good law despite Murphy. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am by NL
Lips v Older was a case presented and argued as common law negligence only, apparently without the existence of the duty being disputed.In relation to Rimmer and Targett, the Claimant argued that issue was a positive duty of the landlord not to take steps to create a dangerous state of affairs and that this remained good law despite Murphy. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm by INFORRM
Next, the Grand Chamber noted that a wider margin of appreciation was generally available in matters liable to offend intimate personal convictions within the sphere of morals, or especially, religion (Murphy v Ireland, no.44179/98, [67]). [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:13 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/LLEIwp (Dean Gonsowski) Court Dismisses Countrywide Data Theft Suit - http://bit.ly/PC4fgK (Justine Gottshall) Crashing the Third Party: Experts Weigh How Far the Government Can Go in Reading Your Email -http://bit.ly/PHUzkO (Richard Brust) Days Five and Six of a Predictive Coding Narrative: Deep into the Weeds and a Computer Mind-meld Moment - http://bit.ly/NMrVLS (Ralph Losey) eDiscovery:  4 Tips for Managing the Document Review… [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 5:46 am by Rosalind English
The important question raised by this apparently silly litigation is therefore whether the time has come to rethink the shibboleth that states have a wide discretion to restrict forms of expression which offend religious beliefs (Murphy v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:57 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/LPLQcg (Bob Ambrogi) Model Behavior: Federal and State Court Rules on eDiscovery - - http://bit.ly/Mk6eHa (Jessica Mederson) Phase 2 of Discovery Pilot Provides Glimpse into Future of eDiscovery – - http://bit.ly/Oxc1V6 (BLLAWG) Robots Are Not Replacing eDiscovery Lawyers - http://bit.ly/MkKifa (Jason Krause) Rules for eDiscovery Vendors in D.C.: Taking A Step Back - http://bit.ly/Lt2hP4 (Cynthia Courtney)… [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:04 pm by CAPTAIN
  And second, remember that there is a large segment of the membership of the DCBA that has never seen the inside of a State courtroom. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 12:19 pm by Mack Sperling
Judge Murphy answered a number of questions about appraiser liability yesterday, in Cabrera v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 12:19 pm by Mack Sperling
Judge Murphy answered a number of questions about appraiser liability yesterday, in Cabrera v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 9:30 pm by Lawrence W. Sherman
As an assistant to New York City’s then-Police Commissioner, Patrick V. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
The Sydney Morning Herald reports that high-profile Sydney lawyer Chris Murphy is suing a newspaper publisher over a story about his appearance in court for his client, actor Matthew Newton. [read post]