Search for: "United States v. Classic"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 1,755
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2010, 12:04 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:58 am
United States, No. 12-622C (2013) involved a solicitation to provide laboratory testing services to the VA in the great state of Kansas, as well as in Missouri and Illinois. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 12:32 am
Chung highlights Justice Field's dissent in Juilliard v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 7:32 am
At the time the suit was filed, the Ninth Circuit authority was unfavorable to their enforcement, but by the approval hearing the United States Supreme Court had rendered its decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 5:30 am
Denmark v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 6:20 am
Supreme Court ruled, in Massachusetts v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 9:39 am
She was referred to the hospital’s inpatient unit that day. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm
As President Trump notes, one of the articles of impeachment [Article 10] charged President Johnson with insulting and denouncing Congress by "mak[ing] and declar[ing] … certain intemperate, inflammatory, and scandalous harangues … [which] are peculiarly indecent and unbecoming in the Chief Magistrate of the United States. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 8:36 am
As it turns out, he is called to a different kind of service – as a clerk at the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 10:57 am
Supreme Court in Rodriquez v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:08 pm
In Wheaton v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
This is especially helpful because the legal and colloquial definitions of monopoly differ throughout history — the term means something different under the current Sherman Antitrust Act, to someone during the era of trust-busting in early 20th century United States, and to a jurist in 18th century England. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:34 am
Because those are federal statutes, they can’t be “preempted” the way state-law claims were in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 10:02 am
And indeed the logic of United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
Prior to the release of Murphy’s letter, GSA stated, “An ascertainment has not yet been made. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
State deficiencies in climate litigations and actions of judges Laurent Fonbaustier / Renaud Braillet 165 Part IV: Cities, States and Climate Change: Between Competition, Conflict and Cooperation Global climate governance turning translocal Delphine Misonne 181 America’s Climate Change Policy: Federalism in Action Daniel Esty 193 Local policies on climate change in a centralized State: The Example of France Camille… [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Hebrew presents special problems inasmuch as it does not include vowels in its classical written form, but similar problems quickly emerge with any and all exercises trying to convey the meaning of the words on a page. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 2:06 am
This makes all the more sense if one transposes, mutatis mutandis, a classic opinion by P.A. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 11:05 am
But the Court instead gutted the Equal Protection clause in the 19th Century in United States v. [read post]
