Search for: "West v. United States" Results 1501 - 1520 of 3,647
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 8:44 am by Conrad Dryland
Now, following the Court’s decisions in Loper Bright and West Virginia v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 6:04 am by Matrix Law
The Secretary of State’s Planning Inspector allowed the respondent’s appeal against Swindon’s refusal of the certificate. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 7:23 am
This is a portion of United Cerebral Palsy's One-Stop Resource Guide. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 10:00 am by Ray Dowd
  I quote:“[A]ny civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the defendants, to the district court of the United States. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 9:51 pm
Malek, to the board of visitors of the United States Military Academy. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:44 pm
The effects have been profound, especially with respect to the role of states, and especially of the United States as its long time position in global affairs undergoes significant change. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 1:08 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeAlleged Crime Boss' Bid to Strike Portion of Count Charging Co-Defendant With Extortion Is Denied United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Section One straightforwardly provides: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Moving beyond the bare text, it is important, even (maybe especially) a hundred years later, to think more about what the Amendment really sought to constitutionally accomplish, and how its full import has not been deeply understood. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 10:15 am
United States, which was argued less than a month before the election, on October 11, 1944. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:52 am by John Jascob
Dissenting Justices Kagan, Breyer, and Sotomayor argued that the Court issued an advisory opinion that flies “in the face of the statute Congress wrote,” while President Joe Biden called it a “devastating decision that aims to take our country backwards” (West Virginia v. [read post]