Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 10,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2009, 3:50 am
Up to this point, a prosecutor in a weapons disability case had to prove only that (a) the defendant had a gun, and (b) he’d been convicted of an offense which barred him from having one. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:40 am
(JMM), Joyce Meyer, and Daniel B. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 10:46 pm
The question is where the will contest to be settled between C and D, would it be appropriate to wipe out the estate in legal fees and thus extinguish B's bequest of $75,000? [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 4:31 am
"Association Best Practices / Legal RequirementsArticle II: Removed statement of full association mission (which is already in the Articles of Incorporation);Article IV, Section G: Clarifies that Directors do not receive compensation for their service on the Board;Article VI, Section A: Clarifies requirements for meeting notice to match those permitted by the Virginia Nonstock Corporation Act;Article VI, Section C: Reduces the quorum at meetings of the association to 10% (current… [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 10:45 pm
The question is where the will contest to be settled between C and D, would it be appropriate to wipe out the estate in legal fees and thus extinguish B's bequest of $75,000? [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 10:42 pm
The question is where the will contest to be settled between C and D, would it be appropriate to wipe out the estate in legal fees and thus extinguish B's bequest of $75,000? [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 10:41 pm
The question is where the will contest to be settled between C and D, would it be appropriate to wipe out the estate in legal fees and thus extinguish B's bequest of $75,000? [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:42 pm
The question is where the will contest to be settled between C and D, would it be appropriate to wipe out the estate in legal fees and thus extinguish B's bequest of $75,000? [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 10:52 pm
The question is where the will contest to be settled between C and D, would it be appropriate to wipe out the estate in legal fees and thus extinguish B's bequest of $75,000? [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:37 am
Neuberger LJ held that: a) at the time of Miss Hickin’s mother’s death, “the tenant” (in this context a joint tenant) for the purposes of s.87 had not died, only one of the people comprising “the tenant” had died”; b) the 1985 Act specifically contemplated the possibility of a secure tenancy vesting by operation of survivorship (see s.88(1)(b)); c) … [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 6:36 am
” D’Antuono v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:26 am
On July 31, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court published an opinion in Petersen v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 1:26 am
Code § 32-30-5-1(5) for a corporation: A receiver may be appointed by the court in the following cases: (5) When a corporation: (A) has been dissolved; (B) is insolvent; (C) is in imminent danger of insolvency; or (D) has forfeited its corporate rights.Do not have your corporate meetings, do not keep corporate minutes, do not pay your annual fee to the Secretary of State, and your corporation may be faced with a… [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 6:29 am
At this point the IPKat has to decide: should he (a) oppose the application by AT Osborne BV on the ground that, given the similarity of the marks and the identity/similarity of the services, there is a likelihood of confusion among relevant consumers, (b) seek an assurance or undertaking from AT Osborne BV that it will limit its specification to reflect the services it actually provides or to exclude the services provided in the field of law, business, finance, media, telecommunications,… [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:51 am
Guido Kucsko also cautioned that OTK v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 4:51 pm
C. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:55 pm
I would expect Mr Ellis to be charged at the grade C rate, and for other more junior costs draftsmen to be charged at the grade D rate. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 3:43 pm
V., Sec. 11 de la Constitución del Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico al Tribunal Supremo para destituir a los jueces de los demás tribunales, por las causas y mediante el procedimiento que se disponga por ley; y de conformidad con el Art. 6.006 de la Ley de la Judicatura de 2003 que provee para aprobar el procedimiento disciplinario de los jueces y las juezas del Tribunal de Primera Instancia y del Tribunal de Apelaciones, se enmiendan las Reglas 13(a), 14,… [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 7:09 am
” Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(c)(2)(B)(v). [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 3:22 am
Christian Serrano Chang por el delito de asesinato en la modalidad estatuida en el Art. 93 (b) del Código Penal. [read post]
