Search for: "Legal Writing Prof" Results 1521 - 1540 of 1,974
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2010, 9:06 pm by Editor
#66 External Insights#67 Antitrust Review#68 Jeremy Blachman's Weblog#69 Unlearned Hand#70 Preaching to Perverted#71 QuizLaw#72 Ernie the Attorney#73 Workplace Prof Blog#74 Global Security Law#75 Concurring Opinions#76 David Maister's Blog#77 Patent Baristas#78 Human Law#79 Tech Law Advisor#80 Blawg Review#81 Bag and Baggage#82 Votelaw#83 Election Law Blog#84 Transcending Gender#85 Freedom to Differ#86 Infamy or Praise#87 Legal Literacy#88 HealthBlawg#89 The… [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 6:56 am
I write this piece not out of conviction that the treaty must reject direct obligations for corporations, but out of concern that the rush to create DIHRO, while stemming from a legitimate frustration, may create larger problems in the future. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:14 pm
And that rehearing decision split 5-5 with Chief Judge Easterbrook writing for the winning side in the dispute, and Judge Posner writing for the losing side. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:41 am by Colin Murray
As the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission (NIHRC) prepares for its new Chief Commissioner to (Prof. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 6:27 am
Commentary on all things legal, organizational, and pop culture will resume by tonight. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
Contact: Please answer the call by way of e-mail to the organizers stating the subject “Call for papers”, c/o Prof. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:41 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
Contact: Please answer the call by way of e-mail to the organizers stating the subject “Call for papers”, c/o Prof. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:35 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
Contact: Please answer the call by way of e-mail to the organizers stating the subject “Call for papers”, c/o Prof. [read post]
10 May 2011, 7:04 am by NBlack
Supreme Court Advisory Comm. on Prof’l Ethics, Op. 701 (2006) and Nev. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
Writing for Legal Times, Todd Ruger reports that retired Justice John Paul Stevens will “testify Wednesday on Capitol Hill at a Senate hearing on the high court’s decision to strike limits on aggregate campaign contributions. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:16 pm by Howard Knopf
They rarely speak or write “out of court” in a public forum, and when they do so, it is invariably in a measured manner and usually on issues such as the administration of justice that are of concern primarily to law students, the legal profession or to other judges. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:13 am by Adam Chandler
Brad Newberg has a guest commentary post on copyright issues at the Legal Pulse, in which he notes a recent trend at the Court of “not tackling [such] issues. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 1:39 pm by Philip Hackney
I write this piece to make two points: (1) had this information been in the initial report, I don’t think we would have had the “scandal” that shook the IRS and the political world of the time; and (2) the TIGTA report built its primary claim on a garbled faux legal postulate. [read post]