Search for: "MATTER OF A J S" Results 1521 - 1540 of 19,320
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2011, 12:20 pm by The Docket Navigator
During a deposition, plaintiff's in-house counsel "expanded on the statements to the PTO, revealing that because of the issue of the different effective filing dates, there was a specific concern that the mixed subject matter claims were technically anticipated by [plaintiff's] publication of [another application]. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 12:37 am
Defendant's motion for attorneys' fees -- following its successful motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction -- was granted in part. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:35 am by The Docket Navigator
The court granted defendant's renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law of no willful infringement where a court in a related case issued a claim construction favoring defendant. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 1:13 am by Roel van Woudenberg
"In J 4/18, the application was filed by two natural persons, one of them having his residence in the Netherlands and the other in France. [read post]
7 May 2020, 6:35 am
Posted by Martin Lipton and Hannah Clark, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Thursday, May 7, 2020 Editor's Note: Martin Lipton is a founding partner of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, specializing in mergers and acquisitions and matters affecting corporate policy and strategy and Hannah Clark is an associate. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 6:48 am by Coby Nixon
June 20, 2011) (Batten, J.)Upon consideration of Defendant Nalco’s alleged conduct with respect to Plaintiff Kemira and two of Kemira’s potential customers, the Court found that a substantial controversy existed between the parties sufficient to provide subject matter jurisdiction for Kemira’s declaratory judgment action. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 12:02 pm by The Docket Navigator
"[The expert's] actual opinions are on matters within his expertise as a patent examiner and former Commissioner of the USPTO. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 10:00 pm
June 22, 2022 Lindhart, J.), the court denied Defendants’ Motion In Limine seeking to exclude the expert testimony of the Plaintiff’s medical doctor who was expected to testify as to the “possibility” that the Plaintiff would need future medical care.This matter arose out of premises liability incident. [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
Again, Warby LJ found that Saini Js conclusions were not “wrong, perverse or otherwise unreasonable” [29]. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 9:53 pm
The defendant correctly contends that a determination as to whether he and the plaintiff were married in a valid Hindu ceremony in India in 1952 improperly involves the court in a religious matter. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 10:48 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Unfortunately, we do have to take matters into our own hands. [read post]