Search for: "Marks v. State"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 19,795
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2014, 4:12 am
Judge Johnston granted defendant’s motion to amend adding state law disparagement and defamation claims in this Lanham Act case involving plaintiff’s 21ST CENTURY SMOKE and defendant’s 21ST CENTURY SMOKING marks. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 10:52 am
In Interprofession du Gruyere v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 5:40 am
This marks the third day of this week’s four-day motions session in United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:43 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:56 am
Today marks the first of a possibly three-day, pre-trial motions hearing in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:15 pm
Miller v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:29 am
This appears for example at paragraph 67 of the judgment of Sir Mark Potter P in Charman v Charman [2007] 1 FLR 1246 (Charman (No 4)) where he says:“… the starting point of every inquiry in an application of ancillary relief is the financial position of the parties. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 6:30 pm
When the lawyers left that firm without notifying the Alabama court, the notice of the court's decision against their client ended up in the New York firm's mail room, where it was marked "Return to Sender. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 4:19 am
United States and Hughes v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 6:06 am
Julius Sämman Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
NARA v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
Whatever your feelings about the doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales], it's a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm
Here is the abstract: New York Times v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:30 am
Recent United States Supreme Court decisions, such as Shelley v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 3:50 am
[www.angel-diaz.us]IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:35 pm
S. 678, 684 (1987) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:26 pm
See Larry Harmon Picture Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:26 pm
See Larry Harmon Picture Corp. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:56 am
In Montres Breguet SA v Samsung Electronics, the owners of Swatch (and various other watch brand trade marks), objected to Samsung providing third-party watch faces on their Galaxy App Store featuring Swatch’s marks (the “Marks”). [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 3:30 pm
The case is Osprey Ship Mgmt. v. [read post]
