Search for: "Rose v. State" Results 1521 - 1540 of 2,318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2015, 7:53 am
The decision is Roger Maier and Assos of Switzerland SA v ASOS plc and ASOS.com Limited at [2015] EWCA Civ 220. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 1:11 pm
The case is TPG Arrow Productions, Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 7:49 am
, Tuesday TiddleywinksAuthor: Rose HughesPREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 199 [Week ending 9 Sep] What does a no deal Brexit mean for trade marks and designs? [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the Online Global Week in Review by subscribing by email, or selecting ‘all posts’ or ‘IP on the net’ for the RSS option at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Change.gov content now under creative commons license (EFF) (Creative Commons) (Lessig) (Michael Geist) (IPKat) (TorrentFreak) (Techdirt) (Creative Commons) DMCA exemption petitions (ContentAgenda) (EFF) (Ars Technica) (EFF)… [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 3:56 pm by Inside Privacy
A number of BIPA actions also remain pending in federal and state courts. [read post]
2 May 2024, 7:07 pm by Trane Robinson
  The proliferation of sports gambling in conjunction with this weekend’s run for the roses makes the Judge Cole’s opinion for Sixth Circuit in Mattera v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:26 am by INFORRM
United States Talks of a federal privacy law continue in the United States, the New York Times reports. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 11:41 am by Andrew Plumb-Larrick
Since the Florida shooting death of Trayvon Martin rose to public attention, that state’s law of self-defense has attracted much attention. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 7:58 pm
  On August 13, 2008, the New Jersey Appellate Division posted to its website in the "unpublished decisions" section a ruling in the case of Darren Kwiatkowski v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
Mill-Rose Company (Docket Report) District Court Arizona: In trial of declaratory relief case, defendant to proceed first and neither party may refer to itself as ‘plaintiff’: DuPont Air Products NanoMaterials L.L.C. v. [read post]