Search for: "State v. Back"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 42,095
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2012, 12:46 pm
Arizona v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 4:52 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 1:21 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:46 pm
This is a welcome step in patent law’s recent turn back toward tort doctrine. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm
So if you think (as the voters do here) that it should be a violation of the Constitution for a state to only allow registered members of a party to vote in that party's primary, then by all means, feel free to make that argument.But the Supreme Court held back in 1990 that it was unconstitutional for states (like California) to require an open primary when that's not what the party wants. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:15 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 12:01 pm
State. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 10:07 am
In Fessenden v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 6:31 am
Haver v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:42 am
CommentThis will be seen as a set-back for many who have followed Everyone In, especially following the largely positive decision in Ncube v Brighton. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 4:48 am
Plaintiff also stated a due process claim for animal control officers entering the property to take animals, plant microchips in them, and then require plaintiff to pay $1,000 to get the dogs back. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 12:44 pm
Boyd v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
In her recent concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 8:49 am
Hereford v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 10:44 am
Today's Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 12:08 pm
Collins v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 6:00 am
An early Supreme Court decision in Chisholm v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 12:15 am
Two years after the Delaware Supreme Court's momentous decision in Smith v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 4:54 am
State v. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 9:57 am
It’s been nearly 10 years since plaintiff in Camicia v. [read post]
