Search for: "State v. David" Results 1521 - 1540 of 12,467
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2014, 1:42 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
David T Morrison and Co Limited t/a Gael Home Interiors v ICL Plastics Limited & Ors, heard7-9 April. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:08 am by Richard Renner
Kohn and I are filing a "friend of the court" brief urging the United States Supreme Court to accept review of, and reverse, the First Circuit's decision in Lawson v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am by Emma Cross, Olswang LLP
Factual background As previously reported on UKSC blog (here and here), this case emerged in the aftermath of a successful 2009 judicial review[1] brought by British businessmen Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay (the “Barclay brothers”) in respect of the Reform (Sark) Law 2008 (the “2008 Law”). [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 1:14 pm by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: LEOBIGILDO URIOSTEGUI ALBARRAN v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:14 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: ANDREW MASCARENAS v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 6:22 pm
In 1972, in Deepsouth Packing Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 11:04 am
  A key witness against him was David Stow, a detective and gang expert. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 3:30 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
An excerpt: Plaintiffs‐Appellants, the Cayuga Nation, a federally recognized Indian tribe, and individual officers, employees, and representatives of the Cayuga Nation, filed this action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (David N. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am by INFORRM
In the case of Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) Nicol J held that a Government Press Release  which meant that the claimant,  Dr Salman Butt, was an extremist hate speaker constituted a statement of opinion, not of fact. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
For The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at Husted v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 5:51 pm
By David Greco Last week, the Ninth Circuit issued its decision in Sullivan v. [read post]