Search for: "State v. Losee"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 13,213
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
United States, 484 U.S. 19 (1987), left unresolved by an equally divided Court. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 11:58 am
The case of Jernigan v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:00 pm
United States and Cantwell v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:04 pm
A Massachusetts federal court has ruled that the Museum of Fine Arts and Harvard University will not lose their collection of ancient Persian objects to eight plaintiffs injured in a 1997 terrorist bombing. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 7:17 am
More importantly, if we are going to compare apples to oranges, the ACA’s Medicaid provisions have an explicit provision stating that if the state declines to participate, it loses the program funds (this was the provision at issue in NFIB v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 10:30 am
Represented by lawyers for the state, Chapman came to the Supreme Court last year, asking the justices to take up her case and weigh in on the question of immunity – including whether, in the wake of the court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
Austin v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 12:03 pm
” Moore v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 6:05 pm
In Provost v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 10:09 am
In South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:07 am
A federal jury found that the mistakes of James Moser in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 9:43 am
Single-firm conduct can also be actionable under state and federal antitrust law. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 8:49 am
American Ctr. for Int'l Labor Solidarity v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 2:49 am
This reasoning is surprising and arguably incorrect because the «notion of aid» loses its objective nature and becomes entirely dependent on the structure of Member States’ tax systems, in clear contrast with consolidated fiscal State aid case law.9)Court of Justice, 21 December 2016, Commission v World duty free group, Case C-20/15 P, ECLI:EU:C:2016:981, paras. 76 -79 «the selectivity of a tax measure can be established even if that… [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 11:28 am
Several months ago, the arbitral tribunal in the matter of Philip Morris v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 5:04 am
United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 3:15 am
Eva’s Bridal Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 11:12 am
To topple the app store monopolies thorough state legislation is rather ambitious, but my initial analysis is that the Coalition for App Fairness (CAF) has everything to gain and nothing to lose by playing that game. [read post]
