Search for: "Way v. State" Results 1521 - 1540 of 59,133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2018, 6:17 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case highlights the distinctions between federal false arrest claims and state law malicious prosecution claims.The case is Shen v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:09 am by Jeremy
" and it will appear in the print version of JECLAP at (2015) 6 (2): 96-97.The case in question is Case C-351/12 OSA – Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním o.s. v Léčebné lázně Mariánské Lázně a.s., 27 February 2014 and Eleonora's abstract reads as follows:Even where national law reserves collective management of rights to a certain collecting society, this does not… [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:23 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The measure was similar to the blanket prohibition on persons subject to immigration control marrying without the Secretary of State’s written permission found to be unlawful in R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 6:55 am by The Law Offices Of Peter Van Aulen
Brandt To better understand the current status of grandparent visitation in the state, we need to discuss a case called Moriarty v. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 3:15 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
(collectively, “Genentech”) appeal from a decision of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware holding that: (1) the claims of its Liver Function Test (“LFT”) patents1 are unpatentable as obvious, (2) sale of Sandoz Inc. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 3:16 pm by CAFE
To listen to the full episode, and get access to all exclusive CAFE Insider content, including the newly launched United Security and Cyber Space podcasts, try out the membership free for two weeks: www.cafe.com/insider Sign up to receive the weekly CAFE Brief newsletter, featuring analysis by Elie Honig: www.cafe.com/brief REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS:  State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 12:08 pm
But last week we ran across a case dismissing an unjust enrichment claim on a ground we hadn’t considered – privity.In Smith v. [read post]