Search for: "AMENDMENT TO RULES FOR MANAGEMENT OF COURT FUND" Results 1541 - 1560 of 2,644
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by Joy Waltemath
Although a court does have the authority to enter summary judgment on its own motion under Rule 56(f), [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:41 am by Jim Sedor
The funds made their way into lower-ballot contests such as attorney general, Supreme Court justice, and state legislator. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 6:11 pm by Nadia Kayyali
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals interpreted this rule as requiring a “clear link” between the foreign human rights abuses and the U.S. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:31 pm
In other words, parishes have First Amendment rights of association, too.Think of each of these well-crafted findings and conclusions as individual nails in ECUSA's coffin that will keep any appellate court from wanting to open it. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 8:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
“Moreover, they invoked medical symbols, referenced publication in medical journals, and described the substantial funds spent on medical research, fortifying the overall sense that the referenced clinical studies establish the claimed benefits. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:36 pm
Previous Katposts on this issue can be found here (about the Court of Justice of the European Union decision) and here (how this relates to parodies). [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
Markus Ederer, the rule of law should be pursuit not only as an ambition in modern societies, but also as a principle commonly accepted in international risk management, a field characterized by crisis and conflicts. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 6:13 am by Joe May
That is because of federal “pay-to-play” rules put into place by the Securities and Exchange Commission that effectively bar many state officials from receiving substantial political contributions from financial advisers interested in the often-lucrative business of state contracts, particularly the management of huge state pension funds. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 9:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
Lawyers for Williams-Yulee took her case to the Supreme Court last June, raising one issue: “Whether a rule of judicial conduct that prohibits candidates for judicial office from personally soliciting campaign funds violates the First Amendment. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 7:34 am by Julie Goldscheid
Finally, a brief filed by Arizona, Hawaii, Illinois, and Washington urge the Court to reject review because such a bright-line rule would best advance the statutory purpose of eradicating discrimination. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
However, it is clear that company boards and senior management will continue to face scrutiny for cyber security issues. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
In Australia where the High Court had bucked the growing trend for courts to issue blocking injunctions forcing ISPs to block access to websites, Music Rights Australia's General Manager Vanessa Hutley said Australian government should undo what the High Court did in the iiNet case. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:42 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Earlier this month, Congress amended the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013 (VAWA) to allow Alaska tribal courts to prosecute non-Indians who commit domestic violence against Indian spouses and partners. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 6:26 pm
CMR' death was mainly real, the trustees having, under the authority of the deed, invested the fund to a large extent in real estate situate in New York and Maryland. [read post]