Search for: "Branch v. Mays"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 6,281
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The Appellant, the Kent branch of the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE), filed a claim for statutory review under section 113 of the 2004 Act challenging the adoption of the Policy. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 4:40 am
Kaley v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 2:13 pm
Circuit Court on Thursday refused, over two judges’ dissents, to reconsider its decision last May in Kiyemba v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:51 pm
Cir 2004]), whether it was or wasn't a “matter” is probably an argument best avoided altogether.In short, when a government agent asks question of a citizen, the citizen may decline to answer the question or answer it honestly but he cannot with impunity knowingly and willfully answer with a falsehood (Bryson v United States, 396 US 64 [1969]). [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 8:00 am
” Rhode Island v. [read post]
11 Jan 2025, 5:10 pm
The ACLU amicus may be accessed here (38 pages). [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 11:56 am
For instance, in Gutierrez-Brizuela v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 12:00 pm
On November 30, the Court will hear oral argument in Setser v. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Petrakis and its December, 2012 decision in Petracca v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 3:54 am
Dupree v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 9:49 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Otherwise, there would be an improper delegation of executive branch power. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 9:36 pm
Accordingly, during this time period, a non-U.S. person may exclude (from its swap dealer de minimis and its MSP threshold calculations) any swap where the counterparty is not a U.S. person, or any swap where the counterparty is a foreign branch [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
With the Union of Ministry of Labour being currently engaged in the process of codification of Industrial Relations laws[4], the question of overhaul of the definition of Industry ought to be left to the political branches of the government. [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
With the Union of Ministry of Labour being currently engaged in the process of codification of Industrial Relations laws[4], the question of overhaul of the definition of Industry ought to be left to the political branches of the government. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 7:19 am
Sebelius and Arizona v. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Dhillon v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:52 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 11:03 am
A good new example is Berg v. [read post]
