Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 3,853
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2015, 4:33 pm
It might be assumed that an extension of the copyright term in the TPP wouldn't affect the United States, because our law already provides for that same copyright term. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:47 am
Some clues as to the ITC's rationale were previously provided by the parties' submissions to the United States Trade Representative (USTR).Now it's time for the complete picture. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:08 pm
By Zachary Wadlé On April 19, 2010, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Costco v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:18 am
Holder.) [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:26 pm
In the course of its analysis, the court traced the original of the work-product doctrine to the United States Supreme Court decision in Hickman v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 10:00 am
I quote:“[A]ny civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the defendants, to the district court of the United States. [read post]
3 May 2013, 10:34 am
Notably, for some companies, (e.g., 1st United Bancorp, Inc.) registration via Form S-4 has served as the avenue of “going public. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:37 am
By the end of 2008, approximately 32,000 same-sex couples had married in the United States, and 80,000 more were domestic partners, reciprocal beneficiaries, or united in civil unions. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 3:42 pm
Zadvydas v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 2:25 am
Just like one of the world's most famous FRAND judges, United States District Judge James L. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:34 am
Qualcomm's amicus curiae brief filed with the Federal Circuit in the appeal of Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 11:00 am
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 1:06 am
Zigann's 2018 Qualcomm v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 5:30 am
In Maryland v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 1:54 pm
The FTC has filed the following complaint with the the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (this post continues below the document): 17-01-17 FTC Complaint v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 12:00 pm
Since the Supreme Court’s 1936 decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm
He had come to the United States from the Phillipines as a child in 1974, and has resided here since then. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
Sundara Rajan, Professor of Intellectual Property Law, University of Glasgow, depicts a fascinating drama in which the principal actors are two literary ladies and, making a relatively rare appearance centre stage, the United States Postal Service. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 11:20 am
Oct. 21, 2020): “because the infringing act of downloading the material occurred on a computer outside the United States, there was no act in the United States to establish jurisdiction” * Donat v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 10:30 am
The Court referred to the cases in Delaware that adopted United States Supreme Court’s definition of materiality, including recent Delaware disclosure opinions in the cases of In re Netsmart Techs., Inc. [read post]
