Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 1541 - 1560 of 19,306
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by David Ardia
This is part V in a series of posts discussing First Amendment Limits on State Laws Targeting Election Misinformation, 20 First Amend. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
However, fun is limited to the first 119 paragraphs, as the last one inevitably states that the GC 'dismisses the action'.The contested Community trade mark In 2001, on application by Mr. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 10:05 am by Paul Horwitz
 Here's the abstract: This Article was written for a symposium held at the University of Georgia School of Law marking the fiftieth anniversary of New York Times v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 6:56 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Since internal use of a mark as a keyword isn’t use of a mark in a trademark sense, and since Radiancy didn’t place the mark on any goods, displays, etc. or use the mark in any way that indicated source or origin, Viatek didn’t state a claim for unfair competition under the Lanham Act. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:10 am by Tian Lu
In class 43, the following three trade marks were the first ones filed by Hunan Chayue: The verbal elements of the three respective trade marks (‘TM Bs’) all have only one character that differs from the TM A:TM A: ‘茶 (tea) 颜 (face) 观 (observe) 色 (colour)’ v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:02 am by Jason Rantanen
In Tam, the majority stated that “trademarks often have an expressive content” and Kennedy stated that “marks make up part of the expression of everyday life. [read post]