Search for: "State v. Self" Results 1541 - 1560 of 14,331
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2024, 9:06 pm by Gabriel Scheffler
For many Americans, the answer to this question appears self-evident—the government is unpopular simply because it does a bad job. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 8:30 pm by Lawrence Solum
First, the Supreme Court’s categorical unwillingness to consider state-law reversals is nothing more than a self-imposed constraint from its 1874 decision in Murdock v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:05 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Self-insured employer or union sponsored health plans (Plans), their fiduciaries, third party administrative or other service providers, and sponsors should consult legal counsel for advice about whether their Plans might violate the Privacy Rule of the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA) by disclosing individually identifiable claims or other Plan records or data to a state “all payer” claims or other data base in response to a state… [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:02 pm by Sandy Levinson
Lee" or by the Supreme Court's decision in Texas v White. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Both instruments are self-executing and will not require implementing legislation. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by admin
Commission on State Mandates (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 266, 272-274; County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 11:44 am by Danielle Citron
Thanks so much to Professor Neil Richards (who generously serves as our First Amendment guest expert) for his thoughts on Snyder v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:26 am by Kate Howard
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit’s reasoning in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 2:48 am by IAN SKELT
  It is self-evident that any case which includes express reference to (amongst others) Donoghue v Stevenson, Hedley Byrne v Heller, Anns v Merton, Murphy v Brentwood, Caparo v Dickman, Stovin v Wise is going to be of importance. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 5:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As proof that Judiciary Law § 487 has entered the mainstream, and will likely be snapchatted soon,  take a look at Delbaun v Self Represented Kevin McKeown  May 30, 2019  Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 157986/2018 Judge: Andrew Borrok. [read post]
State Power First and foremost, states currently retain power to decide who stays home and for how long. [read post]